-->

Wednesday, December 18, 2019

Explore the presentation of illusion and reality in 'A streetcar named Desire' and 'The Glass Menagerie'

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Explore the presentation of illusion and reality in 'A streetcar named Desire' and 'The Glass Menagerie'. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Explore the presentation of illusion and reality in 'A streetcar named Desire' and 'The Glass Menagerie' paper right on time.


Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Explore the presentation of illusion and reality in 'A streetcar named Desire' and 'The Glass Menagerie', therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Explore the presentation of illusion and reality in 'A streetcar named Desire' and 'The Glass Menagerie' paper at affordable prices!


Reality and illusion are two powerful fundamental concepts that have been explored by Tennessee Williams as a playwright in "A Streetcar Named Desire" and "The Glass Menagerie". Reality is reference to the truth and actuality and an acceptance of it, which is juxtaposed by illusion, which comprises deception, imagination, fantasy and may be a distortion of the truth. T.S Elliot suggests that reality is much more than the sum of our physical sensation. Williams utilises several dramatic techniques to convey these paradoxical themes, which involve characterisation, language, and symbolism, which includes, light, music, objects, sound and setting. Through the adoption of such devices Williams as a playwright has effectively depicted the clash between reality and illusion.


The themes of reality and illusion reflect Williams' personal life although "The Glass Menagerie" consists of greater autobiographical relevance that expresses the playwright's childhood relationships with his sister Rose. The collection of glass animals is a good measure of symbolism among Williams' possessions as he describes them as,


"… those little glass animals came to represent in my memory all the softest emotions that belong to the recollection of things past. They stood for all the small and tender things that relieve the austere pattern of life and make it endurable to the sensitive."Order Custom Essay on Explore the presentation of illusion and reality in 'A streetcar named Desire' and 'The Glass Menagerie'


The character of Rose appears to be reflected in the characters of Laura and Blanche. In real life, Rose, like Laura, took a course at secretarial school but ended up in the park, museum or zoo as opposed to a classroom. In the play Laura is physically defected but in actuality the situation was increasingly severe as Rose displayed signs of psychological disturbance, which deteriorated into a pathological withdrawal from reality so harsh that it led to a lobotomy. Williams felt what this operation did to Rose was destroy her imagination at the attempt to surgically retain her normality. Like Tom, in "The Glass Menagerie", Williams had to frequently listen to his mother who also expressed a longing for the south and her youth, portraying reality and illusion. The character of Blanche also reflects Williams' pattern of life as he himself also endured psychological destruction and turned to alcohol and drugs as a result. Williams experienced sexual encounters as Blanche does to escape from the harshness of reality.


Bibsby suggests that most of Williams' characters are guilty of blinding themselves from the stark realties of their situation, and of indulging, "the desire to live with comforting fictions, rather than confront brutal truths, a doomed and ultimately deadly strategy" (Bigsby 17 pg 5.)


Blanche, a faded southern belle, is a fundamental character in "A Streetcar Named Desire" who exemplifies a clear relationship between illusion and reality as she serves as the ultimate embodiment of illusion and withdraws herself from ugly reality as a survival mechanism. She chooses to live in a fantasy "make believe" world that consists of rich admirers, such as Shep Huntleigh, and deceit and as a result she is completely saturated into her illusionary world to such an extent that Williams portrays her as schizophrenic. Blanche is unable to distinguish between reality and illusion and acknowledge that they are distinctive concepts, this is portrayed by Williams' dialogue between Mitch and Blanche when Mitch has acknowledged the truth regarding Blanche's past,


Mitch You lied to me, Blanche.


Blanche Don't say I lied to you.


Mitch Lies, lies, inside and out, all lies


Blanche Never inside I didn't lie in my heart' (asnd) pg101


Blanches's cravings for alcohol are implied as we learn about her guilt and lament towards her husband's suicide and her promiscuity that she camouflages with her class-conscious aristocratic attitude. She relies on alcohol to provide reassurance and comfort to escape against the harshness of reality,


"She catches her breath with a startling gesture. Suddenly she notices something in a half opened closet. She springs up and crosses to it, and removes a whisky bottle. She pours a half a tumbler of whisky and tosses it down. She carefully replaces the bottle and washes out the tumbler at the sink. Then she resumes her seat in front of the table." (Pg6)


Williams presents Mitch as the only sign of hope for Blanche's illusions and desires, as she longs for a sense of security that Mitch is able to provide, but the truth leads to Mitch's rejection of Blanche as he regards her with contempt and refers to her as 'not clean enough to bring in the house with my mother.' (page ref)


Blanche's illusionary world destroys any future success that she could have obtained with Mitch, as the deceit and failure were inextricably linked.


Blanche is aware that something has ended in her life which leads to her psychological deterioration and it can only be recovered through the deceitful fictional roles Williams presents her as desperately performing but finally these fail to offer her immunity from reality


Williams portray Blanche as longing to remain in her illusory and fantasy world. One way in which this is depicted is thorough her terrified response towards aging signs,


BLANCHE …I mean I haven't informed him - of my real age!


STELLA Because of hard knock my vanity has given.


What I mean he thinks I'm sort of prim


and proper, you know! (she laughs out sharply.) I


want to deceive him enough to make him want


me… asnd pg 6


Thus Williams presents Blanche as contemplating a deceiving act regarding her age in order to attract Mitch.


Williams acknowledges the impossibility of recovering the past that is stained by cruelty and corruption, however the future is worse for Blanche.


Williams effectively presents the themes of reality and illusion through the character of Amanda who is an anachronism in St Louis, in "The Glass menagerie" and desperately clings to the ideal girlhood of Blue Mountain thus seen as having parallels with the character of Blanche. A misfortunate middle age in St Louis reveals that she is absorbed by her past and adds a sense of nostalgia to the play as she makes frequent references to her past throughout the play and he retreats into the comfortable, secure world of her youth,


"One Sunday afternoon in Blue Mountain your mother received seventeen! gentlemen callers! Why, sometimes there weren't enough chairs to accommodate them all" (tgm pg 8)


Williams describes Amanda's expectations, dreams and illusion of marrying a wealthy planter and living in a southern aristocratic society have been shattered and destroyed, but her reminiscences are a confusion of wish and reality as she is unwilling to change and obtains a distorted vision of her life.


Amanda's language is excessive as she exaggerates her popularity and romanticises the past how she remembers it,


"…Well, in the south we had so many servants. Gone, gone, gone. All vestige of gracious living! Gone completely! I wasn't prepared for what the future brought me. All of my gentleman callers were sons of planters and so of course I assumed and raise my family on a large piece of land with plenty of servants…" 64 tgm


However Williams there is an element of realism within her character, which portrays when she reveals concern for her children and longs for them to be successful and she wants Laura to train in new technology,


"No, I don't have secrets. I'll tell you what I wished for on the moon. Success and happiness for my precious children! I wish for that whenever there's a moon and when there isn't a moon, I wish for it too." Pg 4 (tgm)


Williams conveys the fact that Amanda endeavours to make a compromise between illusion and reality because although she can never escape the reality of St.Loius she is the only person in the play who is both practical and determined, in her efforts to keep the Wingfield family together following her husband's desertion. Williams presents Amanda as never totally escaping from the harsh present as she is trapped in a world of humiliation as she submits herself to the unpleasant task of selling magazines and work in a department store in order to maintain the household and pay for Laura's abortive business college experience that she perceives and recognises as being valuable


"I put her in business college a dismal failure! Frightened


her so it made her sick at the stomach. I took her over to the


young people's league at the church. Another fiasco. She


spoke to nobody, nobody spoke to her. Now all she does is


fool with those pieces of glass and play with those worn out records.


What kind of life is that for a girl to lead? (pg 5 ) tgm


Williams portrays The Rubicam's Business College as representing the everyday world, which Laura fails to enter.


Amanda feels she must make "plans and provision" (4) in preparation for a gentleman caller and constantly forces her son to work at a warehouse that he detests, she is the only person in the family who is capable of doing these things although it hurts her self-esteem and pride,


"…I know your ambitions don't lie in the ware house, that like everyone in the whole world you've had to make sacrifices, but


There's so many things in my heart that I can't describe to


you!" ( tgm)


Ultimately Amanda does not retreat into her illusions, during a time of great stress, but is sustained in a world of cruel reality, comforting her daughter,


"[…Amanda's gestures are slow and almost graceful, almost dancelike as she comforts her daughter. At the end of her speech she glances a moment at the father picture-then withdraws through the portieres…]."


[Pg 6.]


The setting and the clothing have important representations on a metaphorical level and highlight the concepts of illusion and reality. Amanda illustrates this to a large extent as she attempts to transform the environment in preparation for the gentleman caller to disguise the original appearance of the apartment, thus this highlights the distinction between appearance and reality as Amanda continues to create her illusions,


" Thank heavens I've got that new sofa! I'm also making payments on a floor lamp I'll have sent out! And put the chintz covers on, they'll brighten things up! Of course I'd hoped to have these walls re papered…" 4


Amanda's clothes are also significant to the notion of illusion and reality as she presents herself as outdated relic of her time of youth,


"I've resurrected from my old trunk! Styles haven't changed so terrible mush after all…[she parts the portieres] Now just look at your mother! [She wears a girlish frock of yellowed voile with a blue silk slash. She carries a bunch of jonquils-the legend of her youth is nearly revived. Now she speaks feverishly]" 5


The jonquils and her yellow courting dress symbolise Amanda's past as they are associated with the south and represent her vivacity and her life in the past and her part of her illusion.


Nevertheless Williams does convey the characters of Amanda and Blanche as displaying traditional, southern values but they themselves are faded belles of the south and their attitudes appear to be a superficial facades that evocatively provide reassurance to preserve reality.


BLANCHE I guess I do have old fashioned ideals!


(She rolls her eyes knowing that he cannot see her face…)


Pg 7


Williams presents Laura in "The Glass Menagerie" as being the pathetic figure of the play and her strangeness and vulnerability are further presented as the accelerating factors of her separation from the real world. Laura exemplifies a withdrawal of reality and retreats to the corner of the stage as she huddles amidst the inanimate glass menagerie that indicates her movement away from real life when having to confront reality and the harshness of the situation. One occasion that can be recalled of Laura surrendering to her glass menagerie is when Tom and Amanda are arguing and the circumstances become too harsh for her to tolerate,


"LAURA [shrilly] My glass! menagerie …[she covers her face and turns away.] 4


Laura's glass menagerie is frozen and time is suspended, as it will continue to be suspended for Laura. Laura stands as a paradigm of the culture of which she is a part. The world of modernity that included the dance hall and the typewriter are out of her experience. Laura's glass menagerie symbolises her own private world set apart from reality. The little glass animals suggest the beauty in fragility that must be protected from the harshness of reality. This is a dominant symbol in the play. Laura resembles the characteristics of her glass animals as Williams portrays them as being cold and lifeless in a sterile world.


Vulnerably, Laura chooses the world of a myth, symbolised by a glass unicorn. It is a security broken easily as the unicorns glass horn. Similarly the unicorn is also a mythological animal presented by Williams and does not exist in the real world because it is unique. When the horn is broken Laura is not too upset as Jim, the gentleman caller shelters her and her calmness symbolises her attempt to pit aside her fantasy world for reality,


"[They suddenly bump into the table an the glass piece on it falls to the floor. Jim stops the dance.]…


JIM You'll never forgive me. I bet that was your favourite piece of glass.


LAURA I don't have favourites much. It's no tragedy, Freckles. Glass breaks so easily. No matter how careful you are. The traffic jars the shelves and the things fall off them.


JIM Still I'm awfully sorry that I was the cause.


LAURA I'll just imagine he had an operation. The horn was removed to make him feel less-freakish!


However when she finds out that Jim is engaged, she gives him the unicorn as a souvenir, which symbolises her retreat into her own fragile world. Since the unicorn is no longer "special" it does not hold the special place among the animals as it previously did.


Williams presents Laura's glass menagerie as corresponding to the remoteness of the fairground as they can be seen as performing circus animals providing a sense of escapism into a make believe world that is antithetical to reality. The glass menagerie represents Laura's private illusionary world, set apart from reality where she can be safe and secure as she sees her surrender to the glass menagerie as a form of protection from the cruel outside world.


Williams presents the events that happen to the glass menagerie as affecting Laura's emotional state greatly. Laura withdraws to the company of the glass menagerie when the outside world becomes too threatening. One incident when this is demonstrated is when Amanda advises Laura to practise typing but instead she plays with her glass.


"…She is washing and polishing her collection of glass. Amanda appears on the fire escape steps. At the sound of her ascent, Laura catches her breath, thrusts the bowl of ornaments away and seats herself stiffly before the diagram of the typewriter keyboard as…" pg 11 tgm……..


Blue Roses are identified with Laura, because like Laura they cannot live in the real world. The colour blue symbolises an unearthly quality for the playwright and provide a connection with his sister's name, Rose. Overall Williams presents Amanda, Laura and Blanche as resisting the continuity of time. They remain static in their perspective on life as they long to maintain their youth, beauty and dreams.


Tom is the disillusioned narrator in "The Glass Menagerie" comprising a retrospective view of his life that relates to Williams presentation of reality and illusion as Tom is conveyed as a character who had longed to develop his illusions and dreams into reality. Williams depicts the play, through Tom's perspective thus it is seen as regarded as a "memory play" which could be seen as an illusion in it self as it may be inaccurate in its portrayal. Williams states the atmospheric touches of this "memory play" and subtlety of direction are an important part in the reality of the story,


"The sense is memory and is therefore non realistic. Memory takes a lot of poetic license. It omits some details; other are exaggerated, to the emotional value of the articles it touches, for memory is seated predominantly in the heart. The interior is therefore rather dim and poetic." (pg )


The whole play takes place in Tom's memory and selective perception plays an important part as insignificant parts may be forgotten and made distorted and expressionistic, juxtaposing with reality, as it exists as an aspect of Tom's consciousness,


"Yes I have tricks in my pocket, I have things up my


sleeve. But I am the opposite of a stage magician. He gives


you illusion that has the appearance of truth. I give you truth


in the pleasant disguise of illusion." (pg 4 tgm)


Tom describes the lighting of the Wingfield apartment is of a very shadowy nature, which emphasises the condition of nostalgia and illusion and the resistance against reality in his long retrospective speech as the commerce of the play as he states


"The play is memory. Being a memory play, it is dimly lighted, it is sentimental, it is not realistic." (5)


In 'The Glass Menagerie' the sources of music weaves through the scenes, bridging the sphere of time, highlighting the illusionary world of the past by which Amanda is obsessed and the immutable sorrow of life persists under the superficial gaiety. The victrola, Laura plays represent the youth of her parents and the dance hall mixes the hot swing of the thirties with the slow tangos of the twenties and the tender waltzes of Amanda's girlhood that she strives to retain. The victrola is also seen as an escape mechanism for Laura as it supplies a delicate and kind association that is contrary to the outside world.


The portrait of the absent father is very influential towards the rest of the characters and his facial expressions are emphasised to highlight the misery and reality of the situation and circumstances in the Wingfield household that the father has escaped from,


"There is a fifth character in the play who doesn't appear except in this larger-than- life photograph over the mantel. This is our father who left us a long time ago. He was a telephone man who fell in love with long distances; he gave up his job with the telephone company and skipped the light fantastic out of town…"


Williams depicts Tom as expressing discontentment towards his circumstances in life as he recalls his depressed years of when he worked in a warehouse but revealing aspirations illusions of fulfilling his dreams and escaping from reality and becoming a successful poet. In order to escape the situation at home and reality Tom escapes to the movies and turns to alcohol, like Blanche. Williams depicts the character of Tom as exemplifying the fact that he has transformed his yearned illusions into reality, providing a connection between the two evocative concepts as he escapes from his situation at home that he long resents in order to fulfil his dreams. This is emphasised as his retrospective narration conducted at the beginning of the play is carried out as "Tom enter, dressed as a merchant sailor".


Tom is ultimately, however seen as a victim of illusions as although he escapes the drabness of his warehouse job and the discomforts of his home life, as a narrator he knows from experience, that no amount of travel and adventure will free him from his illusions and shake that demon that is within him. Williams presents Tom as a poet and his diction confirms this, as his dialogue is rebellious and imaginative this is depicted when he speaks with his mother as he portrays an ambitious side that he longs to fulfil but nevertheless is aware of his obligations to his family,


"…Listen! You think I'm crazy about the warehouse? [He bends fiercely toward her slight figure.] You think I'm in love with the continental shoemakers? You think I want to spend fifty-five years down there in that celotex interior! with florescent tubes! Look I rather somebody picked up a crowbar and battered my brains-than go back mornings! I go! Every time you come in yelling that damn "rise and shine!" "Rise and shine!" I say to myself "How lucky dead people are!" But I get up. I go! For sixty five dollars a month I give up all that I dream of doing and being ever!"


Tom's wish to live the life of a hero in an adventure film through the role as a merchant seaman is accomplished and Tom's longing to go to the Movies symbolises his determination to leave the apartment and escape into reality, a place where one can find adventure but Tom being a poet is kept from entering reality by Amanda who criticises him as being a "selfish dreamer",


"…I know what you're dreaming of. I'm not


standing here blindfolded, [she pauses.] Very well, then.


Then do it! But nit till there's somebody to take your place…


Overcome selfishness! Self, self, self is all that


You ever think of" (pg 5)


Ultimately Tom does escape and turn his dream into reality by transferring the payment of the light bill to pay for his dues in the Merchant Seaman's Union. This is his passport out of the drab of existence at the warehouse and the Wingfield apartment. However in his final speech it is apparent that even the Merchant Marine has offered no escape from his responsibility to Laura, the memory of whom haunts him wherever he goes. This portrays that reality does not allow his dreams and illusions to be fulfilled because reality exists as a stronger force intruding upon desired dreams of escapism,


"…Oh Laura, Laura I have tried to leave you behind, but I am more faithful than I intended to be! I reach for a cigarette I cross the street, I run into the movies or a bar, I buy a drink, I speak to the nearest stranger-anything that can blow your candles out!


[Laura bends over the candles.]


For nowadays the world is lit by lightning! Blow out your candles, Laura- and so goodbye…


[She blows the candles out.]" 7


The fire escape holds fundamental symbolic significance as it represents a bridge between the illusionary world of the Wingfields and the world of reality. The people in the Wingfield apartment are figuratively burning and the fire escape is the only immediate escape. It appears to be a one-way passage but the direction varies for each character. For Tom it is an entrance into the real world away from Laura and Amanda. He stands outside to smoke and does not like being part of the illusionary world indoors. For Laura the fire escape is a way into her own illusionary world and to escape reality as she thinks of it as a way in. This is conveyed when Amanda sends Laura to the store and Laura trips on the fire escape this also illustrates that Laura fears the outside world and emotions greatly affect her physical condition,


[She pulls on a shapeless felt hat with a nervous, jerky movement, pleading glancing at Tom. She rushes awkwardly for her coat…]



"AMANDA Laura, go now or just don't go at all!


LAURA [rushing out] Going going!


[A second later she cries out. Tom springs up and crosses to the door. Tom opens the door. Tom opens the door.]


TOM Laura?


LAURA I'm alright. I slipped, but I'm all right"


Williams evocatively depicts the powerful contrast between reality and illusion within the portrayal of the character of Stanley as a representative of reality in "A Streetcar Named Desire" and as having parallels with the character of Jim. Stanley is conveyed as an embodiment of reality, as he is responsible for the revelation of truth regarding Blanche's promiscuous past. Stanley powerfully degrades Blanche towards the end of the play and completely destroys her by violently raping her, which leads to the complete psychological destruction of Blanche and her harsh removal from reality.


Williams presents Stanley as ultimately exposing the reality regarding Blanche's past as continues his attempt to reveal the truth.


BLANCHE "I don't want realism… I tell you what I want. Magic!…


Yes! yes, magic! I try to give that to people. I misrepresent things to them. I don't tell the truth I tell what ought to be the truth. And if that is sinful, then let me be damned for it! Don't turn the light on!" (astnd )


In the character of Stanley Williams manifests that he does not enjoy magic and only longs for the truth,


STANLEY …Some men


Are took in by this Hollywood glamour stuff and


some men are not.


Williams displays the powerfully evocative contradiction between Stanley and Blanche that creates much tension between the two characters and the climax reaches its peak when Stanley exposes Blanche's promiscuous past while Blanche ironically sings in the bath,


STANLEY Our supply man down at the plant had been going


through Laurel for years and he knows all about her


and everybody else in the town of Laurel knows all


about her. She is as famous in Laurel as if she was


the president of the United States, only she is not


respected by any party! This supply-man stops at a


hotel called the Flamingo.


BLANCHE (singing blithely)


Say, it's only a paper moon, sailing over a


cardboard sea


But it wouldn't be make-believe If you believed in


Me!… (streetcar 7)


"It's a Barnum and Bailey world, Just as phoney as it


can be" 81


Williams reveals a symbolic collision between their two philosophies, as the louder Stanley continues insisting on undeniable facts about Blanche, the louder Blanche sings. Williams highlights the extremes of reality and illusions within the characters of Blanch and Stanley as their paradoxical motives in life illustrate the portrayal of reality and illusion.


Stanley is conveyed as an animalistic and brutal character that confronts the harshness of the reality of life. No reference is made to Stanley's past, which suggests he is a character who accepts his present circumstances and lives in realism.


Blanche believes that bathing will symbolically spiritually purify and cleanse the stained past and ugly reality that she refuses to accept that reveals her apprehensions regarding reality she strives to transform and legitimate.


Blanche's stress on seeing something that shatters an ideal or an illusion is echoed throughout the whole play. As Bigsby points out


"the thought with be reiterated (repeated) as a theatrical (dramatic) metaphor at the beginning of scene 10 when Blanche's romantic fantasy in cut short by a glimpse of herself in a hand mirror which she then breaks." bigsby


Williams symbolically presents the breakage of the glass as representing shattered hopes and illusions and the harshness of reality,


"Trembling she lifts the hand mirror for a closer inspection. She catches her breath and slams the mirror face down with such violence that the class cracks.


Music in an effective device that is utilised by Williams to reflect Blanche's emotions and the blue piano represents Blanche's insecurity, as she requires shelter and companionship, which is a factor that has led to her psychological breakdown. The blue piano also signifies the claustrophobic atmosphere of Elysian Fields,


………..


The music is apparent when she recounts the deaths at Belle Reeve, kisses the newsboy and it is the loudest when she departs to the asylum.


The varsouviana echoes her guilt about her husband's death, a disaster to Blanche. It also provides psychological intimacy and is an important technique that allows us access into Blanche's mind thus illustrating her psychological deterioration. The death of Allan Grey remains to be a tragically disturbing event of her life and a part of her ugly reality for which she holds her self responsible.


The gunshot releases her from the torture that she experiences every time she hears the Varsouvianna playing and retrieves her return to reality,


"…(She touches her forehead vaguely. The polka tune starts up again.) pretend I don't notice anything different about you! That


music again…


MITCH What music?


BLANCHE The "varsouvianna"? The polka tune that they were playing. When Allan Wait!


A distant revolver shot is heard. Blanche seems relieved.


BLANCHE There now, the shot! It always stops after that.


The polka tune music dies out again."


Blanche's fineries emphasise her neglect of reality as she fulfils a fictional role in an illusionary, fantasy world that she utilises as a façade to disguise and hide ugly reality that she cannot tolerate, as it has led to her destruction,


"As the drinking and packing went on, a mood of hysterical exhilaration came into her and she has decked herself out in a somewhat soiled and crumpled white satin evening gown and a pair of scuffed silver slippers with brilliants set in their heels. Now she is placing the rhinestone tiara on her head before the mirror of the dressing-table and murmuring excitedly as if to a group of spectral admirers."


Blanche's imagination aids her survival and highlights her aristocratic attitude that she portrays as a southern belle holding and perpetuating an ascending and eloquent social position that no longer exists.


Blanche is ultimately raped in her southern belle dress and completely obliterates her from reality as the consequences lead to severe psychological deterioration and in turn to schizophrenia, where she is unable to distinguish between reality and illusion.


Stanley's denim clothes provide a contrast to Blanche's appearance that signify a working class background and a symbol of the American Dream that relates to the acceptance of reality.


Williams utilises Light is crucial symbolic factor to represents truth that illuminates the rejection of reality. Light fulfils a fundamental role between Stanley and Blanche and Jim and Laura whom can be perceived polar opposites and presented as an antithesis of reality and illusion. Blanche is constantly associated with light from her first appearance in the play in which Williams describes her as a moth,


"There is something about her uncertain manner, as well as her white clothes that suggest that she is a moth." (asnd) pg 4


Blanche longs to camouflage reality as she puts an artificial lantern on the light bulb to live her world of deception and illusion,


"I brought this adorable little coloured paper lantern at a Chinese shop on Bourbon. Put it over the light bulb! Will you, please?" asnd Pg


However Stanley reveals the truth that Blanche attempts to conceal and brings to light the true facts regarding Blanche's past and recognises that she is an embodiment of deception and conceit,


"there isn't a goddam thing but imagination…and lies and conceit and tricks!" (scnd pg 10)


Mitch also acknowledges Blanche's history via Stanley, the source behind the provision of reality and proceeds to rip off the paper lantern from the light bulb and demands to look at her face,…….


…………..quote……………


Stella is an ambiguous character created by Williams, in "A Streetcar Named Desire" who is absorbed into Stanley's world, which she believes is vital in order for her to survive. She has surrendered to Stanley's way of life and it's values. Stella provides the link between the two characters, as she must listen to the fact provided by Stanley and the virtues of idealism given to her by Blanche.


Stella makes a clear decision between Stanley and Blanche, after Blanche has made negative condemnations regarding Stanley, in attempt to persuade Stella to escape,


"STELLA has embraced him with both arms, fiercely,


And full in the view of BLANCHE. He laughs


and clasps her head to him."


Stella's comprises a state of "narcotised tranquillity" in her existence at the end of scene four, that reveals that she willingly accepts Stanley's domineering behaviour and machismo. She cannot imagine life without Stanley therefore her readiness to sacrifice her sister becomes inevitable. She has made a compromise that depicts her commitment to Stanley, which may serve as a survival mechanism for her and her new baby. It can be argued that Stella does not want to confront reality as it may occur to her that Blanche may be correct regarding her accusations about Stanley,


"STELLA I couldn't believe her story and go on living with Stanley.


EUNICE Don't ever believe it. Life has got to go on. No matter what happens, you've always got to keep going."


In this exchange between Stella and Eunice, Williams clearly depicts Stella's unwillingness to consider Blanche's explanations as she rejects the acceptance of what may actually be reality thus making a compromising her relationship with Blanche.


Williams presents Jim O'Coner, as the gentleman caller in "The Glass Menagerie" who is long anticipated by Amanda because he is whom they have waited for all their lives. He has parallels with the character of Mitch as they both serve to fulfil a sense of hope. Jim symbolises the outside world from which the Wingfields are somewhat isolated. He compares to Stanley in the sense that he also symbolises reality in "The Glass Menagerie" representing the one thing that Laura and Amanda fear and reject to confront. He represents Amanda's days of youth, when she went frolicking about picking jonquils and supposedly having "seventeen gentlemen caller on one Sunday afternoon".


Between the spiritual and physical needs of the characters conflict overlays between the painful present and the ideal past.


Jim's speech is an effective contrast to that of Amanda's as his diction is one of a person undertaking a course of public speaking, that is warm and friendly. He uses colloquialisms common in the 10's as he speaks confidently by a culture very different to that of Amanda's, thus his dialogue can be seen as reflecting his character


"Because I believe in the future of television [turning his back to her.] I wish to be ready to go right along with it. Therefore I'm planning to get in on the ground floor. In fact I've already made the right connections and all that remains if for industry itself to get under way! Full steam-[his eyes are starry] knowledge-Zzzzzp! Money-Zzzzzp! Power! That the cycle democracy is built on!"


Jim reveals enthusiasm and inspiration as he is concerned with achievement and development, his illusion appears to be the American dream, which juxtaposes with Amanda and Laura who maintain their stasis in time,


"…What impressed me the most was the Hall of Science. Gives you an idea of what the future will be in America, even more wonderful than the present time is" tgm 7


Jim reveals his contact with the outside world, which is evident in the eager tome of voice.


Although Amanda desires to see Laura settled down it is hard to distinguish whether she longs for the gentleman caller to be invited for Laura or herself. Ultimately he fails to fulfil the role of as a redeemer for Laura.


However Jim himself is plagued by doubts and must live in his own world of illusion, he thus symbolises the universality of uncertainty and inability to live in a harsh reality.


Light is associated with Jim as he represents reality, an antithesis to Laura's dark and melancholy world in her rejection of reality. He is also referred to as "Mr. Light bulb" (67)


He also brings in the candles when he approaches Laura,


"[Jim comes into the dining room, carrying the candelabrum, it's candles lighted, in one hand…] (pg 70)


When the atmosphere is invaded by darkness during the meal at the Wingfield's Jim enters with the candles that provide the light, symbolically representing an embodiment of the truth and reality towards which Laura behaves in a fearful manner. This illuminates the juxtaposition of illusion and reality represented by Jim and Laura.


"[Jim comes into the dinning room, carrying the candelabrum, it's candles lightened, in one hand and a glass of wine in the other. The door of the kitchenette swings closed on Amanda' gay laughter; the flickering light approaches the portieres. Laura sits up nervously as Jim enters. She can hardly speak from the almost intolerable strain of being alone with a stranger. ]" 70 tgm


However candle light as the only source of light that is available during Jim's visit illustrates that he is not the saviour and sign of hope that Amanda assumes he is as his departure shatters her illusions. This could also be symbolised by the failure of electricity after their dinner. Eventually he leaves Laura in the darkness, which is symbolised by the black - out and by Laura blowing out Jim's candles to end the play. The joyful moments flicker only for an instant within the surrounding darkness of eternity as when Jim and Laura look at the little glass unicorn together by candlelight. The gentle man caller does not fulfil the role of a redeemer and the altar candles in Laura's heart are soon extinguished.


Stanley and Jim are nevertheless not suspended in time and represent reality. They represent the American dream and accept their life and work on the principle of meritocracy in a democratic society. The character of Stanley has no past, which emphasises further that he lives in the present,


"I am not a Polack. People from Poland are Poles, not Polacks. But what I am is one hundred percent American, born and raised in the greatest country on earth and proud as hell of it, so don't ever call me a Polack." Scnd 1


In conclusion, Williams very effectively presents the conflict between reality and illusion and he communicates his themes very successfully through a variety of dramatic techniques such as characterisation, setting and symbolism, which includes light and sound. As the audience, tribute can be paid to his powerful dramatisation of this antithesis of the playwright.


Please note that this sample paper on Explore the presentation of illusion and reality in 'A streetcar named Desire' and 'The Glass Menagerie' is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Explore the presentation of illusion and reality in 'A streetcar named Desire' and 'The Glass Menagerie', we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on Explore the presentation of illusion and reality in 'A streetcar named Desire' and 'The Glass Menagerie' will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.


Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!


Monday, December 16, 2019

Jewish Pligrimage

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Jewish Pligrimage. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Jewish Pligrimage paper right on time.


Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Jewish Pligrimage, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Jewish Pligrimage paper at affordable prices!


Questions on Jewish Pilgrimage


Task 4, pg 8


a) A Jewish pilgrim, when on a visit to the Western Wall, is likely to


· Cover their heads, if a male JewOrder custom research paper on Jewish Pligrimage


· Pray a great deal


· Wash their hands before going to the wall


· Pray separately from the opposite sex


· Push pieces of paper, on which are written prayers, into cracks in the wall


b) Such an experience is a pilgrimage rather than a tourist visit, because when you visit the Western Wall, you show a great deal of respect, and are more serious about the event compared to how you would be if it were a tourist visit. Also during the time at the Western Wall, one spends a lot of time praying and abide by the same rules that they would when in a religious place such as the synagogue (where, for example the male congregation would be separate from the female congregation). Also a Jew must feel that he is going there to fulfil a religious commitment and not to spend their time there drinking or clubbing, etc as they might do when on a holiday for a tourist visit.


c) A Jew's faith may be strengthened by visiting the Western Wall, in that it is the only living memory from the days of the Temple, and so they will feel that when they visit they are still the living part of Judaism, and that Judaism as a whole is still living. Also Jews must come together at a time like this, where all that is left is the Western Wall and use the power within them to do as much as possible to protect it. It is almost as if the Western Wall symbolises Judaism as it is today, and that Jews must stick together to keep the "memory" alive.


Task , pg 7


"A place like Yad Vashem only serves to keep alive feelings of bitterness and hatred. It would be better to forgive and forget."


In agreement with this view Yad Vashem does keep the hatred alive, and will always be a reminder of what happened to the Jews, and could therefore influence them in future decisions.


In opposition to this view if all the people forgot and forgave, then it could happen again. It is a way of always remembering what happened and therefore a way of preventing something like it happening again.


Task 11, pg 44


Task 1, pg 44


"Yad Vashem should not merely be a place of pilgrimage for Jews but for people of every race."


If people of all races came to visit Yad Vashem, it would teach them about what happened in the Holocaust and encourage them to understand how difficult and how dreadful it must have been for the Jewish people, and so it will make them feel more compassionate towards them.


Also the vast torture that went on during World War II, were not all carried out on Jews, but people of other races as well and so this will make people from other religions and races understand what it may been like for their ancestors too.


Overall it would be better for people from all races visited Yad Vashem as otherwise there is the slight possibility that it may be a place that is ignored by all others and the full meaning of what actually happened during the holocaust is unknown from a perspective of people of the other races, if they do not visit Yad Vashem.


Please note that this sample paper on Jewish Pligrimage is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Jewish Pligrimage, we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on Jewish Pligrimage will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.


Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!


Friday, December 13, 2019

I hate school

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on i hate school. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality i hate school paper right on time.


Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in i hate school, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your i hate school paper at affordable prices!


i do not like school it is very stupid"7- 1- 4- - - " announced the man on the radio.


"SWEET LORD!" I screamed in surprise, "I WON!"


I had just won the jackpot in the Pennsylvania lottery. I did not know what to do with myself. After running around my house for several minutes, I finally composed myself, got in my car, and was off to claim my prize.


"Wake up!" shouted my dad, growing frustrated.


Custom writing service can write essays on i hate school


"O jeez" I thought to my self, "I was just a multi-millionaire, now here I am in my normal 16-year old life."


Disappointed, I tried to prolong the happiness I just felt as long as possible by staying in the comfort of my bed. I just could not part with my large fluffy pillow and my warm comforter. Something about my bed just would not let me leave, my eyelids grew heavy and I was eventually back to cashing my ticket.


"RENA MARLANIA, NOW!" ordered my father.


I decided he was right, as I forced my self to roll over. My warm bare feet hit the cold carpet and sent a chill through me. It was as if my surroundings were actually telling me not to leave my bed. Nevertheless, I stood up and clunked down the stairs with sheer clumsiness. As I trekked to the bathroom, I dreaded the day ahead of me and was yearning to go back to my cozy bed. Still hopelessly tired, I yawned and turned on the water. I hopped in and as I showered, I caught myself dozing off with visions of my lottery money still in my head. Once again, I snapped out of it, and came back to the real world. I reached for the shampoo, squirted it into my hand, then slathered the fragrant substance through my hair. As it foamed up, it ran down my face and stung my tired eyes.


"Would you hurry up in there?" interrogated my brother, "We have 15 minutes and I want to get a shower to, you know?"


I ignored him and finished my exhausting shower. I then grabbed a towel, wrapped myself up and stumbled back upstairs. Upon entering my room, I realized I did not know what I was to wear. I collapsed to my knees and quickly began rummaging through a mass of clothes laying on the floor. I had no hope of finding clothes this way, so I arose to my feet and began to search my closet for an outfit. I would pull a shirt from its hanger, give it an awkward look then toss it behind me and let it float gracefully to my cluttered floor. After I had done this several times I finally found a shirt that I could wear, grabbed jeans and got dressed. Remembering my brother was still in the shower, I walked as quietly as possible through my mother's room and to her bathroom. I tried to close the door quietly behind me, even though it made a loud creak. I combed my wet matted hair, then proceeded to dry it.


How fortunate we are to have you join the panel of judges who will select the winners of the dance contest to be held


You will be joined on the panel by selected faculty members from Twin Cities University and local high schools. It is especially fitting, though, to have a professional critic on the panel.


Your insistence on serving without honorarium is most commendable. Please knew how grateful we are.


As the contest date nears, I'll send a friendly reminder.


Cordially yours


Please note that this sample paper on i hate school is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on i hate school, we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on i hate school will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.


Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!


Tuesday, December 10, 2019

Indian Independence

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Indian Independence. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Indian Independence paper right on time.


Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Indian Independence, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Indian Independence paper at affordable prices!


The reasons for Indian Independence


World War I


During the war 1,50,000 Indians fought for Britain. They served in France in the trenches, but also fought in the Middle East and Africa. They proved themselves to be brave and loyal. This made many Indians expect that they would receive independence as a reward. Congress demanded that the British government should set a date for independence.


M K Gandhi Help with essay on Indian Independence


Gandhi returned to India from South Africa in 115. He spent a year travelling, but from 117 began to take over Congress and attracted a lot more support. Before this, Congress had been made up of well-educated and well-off Indians, but Gandhi dressed in Indian clothes and tried to appeal to all Indians. He began a campaign of Satyagraha. He urged Indians not to co-operate with the British authorities. From 10 Gandhi became the main leader of the campaign to get independence. Gandhi said that his followers should


not become angry with their opponents,


put up with the anger of their opponents,


put up with the attacks of his opponents and never attempt to fight back,


allow themselves to be arrested,


allow their property to be taken away from them.


The Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms (11)


This was an attempt to change the government of India and give Indians more say. Edwin Montagu was the Secretary of State for India and Lord Chelmsford was the viceroy. Montagu said that India would eventually become independent, but refused to set a date. The reforms allowed Indians to control education and public health, but the British kept control of the police, the law courts, law and order, and taxation. Many Indians were very disappointed.


The Rowlatt Acts


During the First World War the viceroy had been given special powers to arrest and imprison people without trial and to try suspects without a jury. The powers were unpopular, but were accepted because it was believed that they would only last as long as the war. In February 11, however, these powers were extended, although the war had finished. Many Indians were outraged and there were protests all over India. In Amritsar on 10 April five Britons were killed and another was beaten.


Amritsar


In Amritsar the newly arrived British army commander, General Dyer, banned all meetings. Sikhs gathered on 1 April 11 for a festival in the Jallianwalla Bagh, an open space surrounded by walls. Dyer had the exits blocked and then, without warning, ordered his soldiers to open fire at the Indians. 71 were killed and more than 1,00 were wounded. Dyer then announced a curfew, which meant that the wounded could not be tended to until the next morning. News of Amritsar was heard with horror all over India. Many Indians felt that after that events they simply could not trust the British. One such Indian was Motilal Nehru, the father of Jawarhal Nehru, one of Gandhis closest supporters. Motilal gave up his career as a lawyer and also became a supporter of Gandhi. The Nehru family were extremely high caste Indian family and they threw their support behind Gandhi and even donated their family home to the Gandhi movement which used it as an Ashram. This example of support from a high caste family demonstrates how Gandhi appealed to all Indian groups.


Summary


So you can see that the years from 117 to 10 were very important. It was the time when


Many Indians started to feel that the British could not be trusted


Many Indians believed that the British did not intend to give India independence


Many more Indians joined the campaigns for independence


A national movement for independence was created


There was a leader of the movement who the British found very difficult to deal with.


Gandhi was thus firmly anchored to pacifism when the war broke out in 1, but many of his closest colleagues and the rank and file in the Indian National Congress could not bring themselves to accept the feasibility of defending the country against aggression without resort to arms. Twice during the warafter the fall of France in 140, and the collapse of the British position in South East Asia in 141when there was a possibility of a rapprochement between the Congress and the Government for a united war effort, Gandhi stepped aside rather than be a party to organized violence. The rapprochement did not come. The only serious British effort for a compromise was made in the Spring of 14 with the dispatch of the Cripps Mission to India; it proved abortive.


For nearly two and a half years, Gandhi had resisted pressure from a section of his following for the launching of a mass movement. It became clear that the British Government first under Chamberlain, and then under Churchill, was reluctant to assure Indian freedom in the future, or to offer a practical token of it in the present Gandhi had endeavoured to restrain the radical wing of the Congress party, and diverted its discontent into individual Satyagraha, a subdued form of civil resistance confined to selected individuals


Gandhi with Sir Stafford Cripps, March 14


After the failure of the Cripps Mission, Gandhi noted with concern that in the face of grave peril posed by the Japanese advance in South East Asia, the mood of the people of India was not one of resolute defiance, but of panic, frustration and helplessness. If India was not to go the way of Malaya and Burma, something had to be done, and done quickly. He came to the conclusion that only an immediate declaration of Indian independence by the British Government could give the people of India a stake in the defence of their country.


QUIT INDIA resolution, 14 Churchills racialist hypocrisyEven after more than half a century, the Quit India resolution adopted by the Indian National Congress stands out as a landmark event in the countrys history. The trigger for the resolution was the failure of the British Cabinet Mission led by Sir Stafford Cripps, Lord Privy Seal. Both the Congress and the Muslim League rejected the Cripps proposals. The ironical part is that Cripps himself was in sympathy with the Congress demands and wasnt in any way responsible for the fiasco. The villain of the piece was the British War Cabinet -- ie. Winston Spencer Churchill, who was the War Cabinet. Nobody else mattered. Churchill at the time wielded greater powers than even the acknowledged dictators. Even Hitler had to consult Himmler, Goebbels, or Goering, and give way to them at times. But Churchill gave way to nobody. The underlying situation is brought out clearly in VB Kulkarnis scholarly work British Dominion in India and After. After Japans crippling attack on the American Pacific Fleet at anchor in Pearl Harbour and the swift advance of the Japanese across East Asia, the US had its own geostrategic concerns to consider. One of them was the possibility of a Japanese advance through Burma (now known as Myanmar) into India (then, of course, undivided). In such an event, the US felt that Indian support would be vital. The US was openly worried over Churchills attitude towards Indian independence, and President Roosevelt had sent a personal representative to India, Colonel Louis Johnson. The message sent by Johnson on April 11, 14, is revealing Cripps is sincere...To my amazement, when a satisfactory solution seemed certain, Cripps with embarrassment told me that he couldnt change the original Draft Declaration without Churchills approval, and that Churchill had cabled him that he will give no approval unless [General] Wavell and the Viceroy separately send their own code cables unqualifiedly endorsing any change Cripps wants. The Draft Declaration referred to was the British governments scheme for so-called Indian self-government, published on March 0, 14. It envisaged a constitution-making body which would have to give a commitment for the future(!) to the British government that the interests of racial and religious minorities would be duly protected. How, asks Kulkarni pertinently, could any government making such a commitment to an outside body claim to possess untrammelled sovereignty? As regards the present, the Draft Declaration for self-government sanctimoniously declared that the people of India should participate effectively in the counsels of their country, of the Commonwealth, and of the United Nations (!)


India had been made a belligerent without the concurrence of Indian leaders. The Congress now proposed that the Viceroys Executive Council should be regarded as a full-fledged Cabinet, with a Defence portfolio handled by an Indian. Against the background of the tremendous contribution made by hundreds of thousands of Indian armed forces to the Allied cause in World War 1 -- a contribution that had been enshrined in the thousands of names of Indian dead inscribed in the War Memorial at India Gate in New Delhi -- the Defence portfolio proposal was by no means unreasonable. Cripps himself, says Kulkarni, was inclined to accept the Congress proposal. About the Draft Declaration itself, Kulkarni writes It was absurd to expect Congress to accept an offer which, as Johnson so aptly put it, contained little more than the unkept promise of the First World War...The Congress Executives Quit India resolution adopted in Bombay on August 8, 14 was therefore the natural reaction of a disappointed people. New light has been shed on Churchills racist arrogance by the recent release of certain British Intelligence records relating to the period. Some of the records made available have been used by British journalist turned historian Patrick French, extracts from whose readable book Liberty or Death have been published by newsmagazine Outlook in its August 5, 17 cover story. Patrick writes of Churchill His understanding of the countrys social and religious structures was superficial. He had a broad, emotional Edwardian belief in the racial superiority of the pinkish-grey races and the need to maintain the British Empire. It was once suggested to him that he should meet some prominent political activists who were then in London. Churchills reply I am quite satisfied with my views on India. I dont want them disturbed by any bloody Indian. Churchill blatantly employed racist arrogance, bluff, and the myth of British superiority, to stall Indian independence. To him, India only stood for the basis of British imperial power. He was hypocrite enough to stall Indian independence at a time when his own agents in India were busily recruiting Indians for the armed forces. His hypocrisy allowed him to do all this despite the magnificent contribution of the Indian armed forces to the war effort, on several fronts. From a mere 50,000 at the outbreak of World War in 1, the number rose to well over ,000,000 bloody Indians. Did Churchill realise that he was a racial hypocrite?


Massacre of Hindus Direct Action day 146


ExtractMUSLIM LEAGUE ATTACK ON SIKHS AND HINDUS IN THE PUNJAB 147, Muslim League Attack on Sikhs and Hindus in the Punjab 147, by Sri. S. Gurbachan Singh Talib. This is the report submitted to Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee by Sri. S. Gurbachan Singh Talib and later published as a book by Voice of India with a forword by Sri ram Swaroop. The full book is available in the voi.org


Mr. H. S. Sahrawardy, Premier of Bengal, said


"Muslim India means business."


How grimly it 'meant business' was shown by the Calcutta killing, and was later on shown by Noakhali, N.-W. F. P. and the Punjab.


Mr. Jinnah in a statement issued from Bombay on September 11, 146 offered to the Hindus the choice between creating Pakistan and forcing a Civil War in the country.


Replying to a question seeking suggestions for the restoration of peace in India, he said"


"In view of the horrible slaughter in various parts of India, I am of the opinion that the authorities, both Central and Provincial, should take up immediately the question of exchange of population to avoid brutal recurrence of that which had taken place where small minorities have been butchered by the overwhelming majorities."


Thus, scouting any suggestion that there could be peace and amity in the country, he advocated exchange of population-the uprooting of millions-and as it later turned out to be, of over twelve millions, and the butchering of about a million. This was the direction in which the Muslim League was inevitably leading the country.


What shocked the conscience of India even more than Calcutta, was the large-scale murder, loot, arson, rape, abduction and forced marriage of Hindu women in the Noakhali District of Eastern Bengal. This time the trouble came about in the October of 146. It appears the League enthusiasts were on the look-out for an area of operation where they could be sure of very little resistance and where they could demonstrate to the Hindus in action as to what was in store for them in case they did not accept the Muslim League demand of Pakistan. In Calcutta the Hindus-although on the first two days they were completely surprised, and reeled under the sudden blow, and lost more than a thousand in killed-yet on the subsequent days they rallied and gave the Muslims as good as they got. The Muslim League perhaps realized the folly of having tried out Calcutta. A better spot should be selected, and this time it was Noakhali and the adjoining area of Eastern Bengal.


The district of Noakhali is almost at the extreme end of Eastern Bengal, surrounded by heavy Muslim majority areas. This district itself has perhaps the lowest percentage of non-Muslim population-the Muslim percentage being as high as 81.5. So, while it was particularly dastardly of the Muslims of this area to have chosen to fall upon the Hindus of this area, it was, from the point of their own scheme, a fit choice; for its very sparse Hindu population could offer little resistance to their onslaught. Attacks on a scale as large as Noakhali also occurred in the district of Tipperah, neighbouring on Noakhali, and with a Muslim population of 77.0%.


As the trouble broke out, for some time the country did not know about it. Noakhali is a far-away part of Bengal, and the Muslim League Ministry of Bengal did not allow the news of the carnage to trickle though as long as they could help it. So, the assailants had it all their own way for several days, unchecked.


The horror and the underlying conspiracy of this occurrence can best be described in the words of Shri S. L. Ghosh of the A. B. Patrika, quoted above. Says Shri S. L. Ghosh


"The four days' delay in receiving the news indicates at once the magnitude of preparations of the lawless elements as well as the criminal inefficiency of the administration machinery. It took ten days, fraught with horror, disgrace and torture for nearly two lakhs of Hindus for the Army to reach the neighbourhood of disaster, another ten days for them to move into the inner fringe of the disturbed area, and over a month to comb the interior of the devastated countryside.


"The horror of the Noakhali outrage is unique in modern history in that it was not a simple case of turbulent members of the majority community killing off helpless members of the minority community, but was one whose chief aim (to quote Dr. Syama Prosad Mookerjee) was mass conversion, accompanied by loot, arson and wholesale devastation……… No section of the people has been spared, the wealthier classes being dealt with more drastically. Murder also was part of the plan, but it was mainly reserved for those who were highly influential or who resisted. Abduction and outrage on women and forcible marriages were also resorted to; but their number cannot be easily determined. The slogans used and the methods employed indicate that it was all part of a plan for the simultaneous establishment of Pakistan. The demand for subscriptions for the Muslim League and for other purposes, including conversion ceremonies, showed that mass attackers, and their leaders were inspired by the League ideology.


"Apparently, the strategy of terrorisation adopted in Calcutta had failed to achieve the objective of recognition of Pakistan. The zealots of Pakistan in Noakhali and the southern portion of Tepperah, therefore, sought to make that muslim-majority area exclusive to a certain community, and thus convert it into the fortress of Eastern Pakistan, by forcible mass conversion of the other community…… (The League) leaders tried to minimize the enormity of the crimes…… they tended to confirm the impression that they were in close sympathy with the attackers and their nefarious policy and that this was the second phase of the direct action plan of the Muslim League to achieve Pakistan.


"It is false to suggest that the perpetrators were a gang of hooligans or that they mostly consisted of outsiders. The local people were the perpetrators in many cases and there was a general mass sympathy for what happened.


"The total number of evacuees, those, that is, who could leave the area of the disturbance alive, will be somewhere between 50 to 75 thousands including men, women and children of all conditions and castes.


"Over and above these persons, there will be another 50,000 or even more who are still living within the danger zone in what may be called the no man's land. Theirs is the most tragic fate. They have all been subjected to conversion and are still under the clutches of their oppressors. Most of them have lost everything, and they suffer from both physical and mental collapse. Their humiliation and torture know - no limitations. Their names have been changed; their womenfolk insulted; their properties looted; they are being compelled to dress, to eat and to live like their so-called new brothers in faith. The male members have to attend the mosques, Maulvies come and train them at home; they are at the mercy of their captors for their daily food and indeed for their very existence. . . ."


These occurrences shocked Mahatma Gandhi, and indeed the whole of India, very deeply. The Mahatma asked Acharya Kripalani; President of the Congress, to go to Noakhali and to see what could be done to bring relief to suffering humanity there, and to try to restore good relations between the communities there. Not long after, the Mahatma himself went there, and made his famous village to village, nay house to house trek, trying to restore good-will. How little the Muslim League fanatics cared for the Mahatma's noble teaching was made abundantly clear by what happened hardly within a month of the Mahatma's pilgrimage to Noakhali, in the North-Western Frontier Province, and another two months after that in the Punjab.


Acharya Kripalani's account of what he observed in Noakhali substantiates the statement of Dr. Mookerjee reproduced above. Said the Acharya


"Next morning (October , 146) we visited the interior of one of the affected areas. The place was Charhaim. Charhaim village and the surrounding areas are occupied by Namasudras (scheduled castes) numbering about 0,000. It was completely destroyed. Most of the houses were burnt. People were living in sheds, built from the ruins of their houses. All their property had been looted. Cash, ornaments, utensils and clothes, and cattle also, had been taken away by the raiders. All the males and females had only the clothes they were wearing. They had no food to eat. Their condition was pitiable in the extreme. There had been cases of murder, but it was not possible during the short time at our disposal to ascertain the number of the killed. Cases of abduction were reported to us. Even after looting and arson the villagers were obliged to embrace Islam; They had to perform 'Namaz' and recite the 'Kalma'……… All the images of the houses were broken and temples looted and destroyed. The conch-shell bangles of women and vermillion marks, signs of their married life, were removed."


This was a fairly representative area. Acharya Kripalani arrived at certain conclusions regarding the Noakhali trouble, which are as follows-


1. The attack on the Hindu population in the districts of Noakhali and Tipperah was previously arranged and prepared for. It was deliberate, if not directly engineered by Muslim League. It was the result of Muslim League propaganda. The local evidence all went to prove that prominent League leaders in the villages had a large hand in it.


. The authorities had warnings about what was coming. The warnings were conveyed to them orally and then in writing by prominent Hindus in the areas concerned.


. The Muslim officials connived at the preparations going on. A few encouraged. There was a general belief among the Mussalmans that the Government would take no action if anything was done against the Hindus.


4. The modus operandi was for the Muslims to collect in batches of hundreds and sometimes thousands and to march to Hindu villages or Hindu houses in villages of mixed population. They first demanded subscriptions for the Muslim League and sometimes for the Muslim victims of the Calcutta riots. These enforced subscriptions were heavy, sometimes amounting to Rs. 10,000 and more. Even after the subscriptions were realized, the Hindu population was not safe. The same or successive crowd appeared on the scene later and looted the Hindu houses. The looted houses in most cases were burnt……… Sometimes before a house was looted the inmates were asked to embrace Islam. However, even conversion did not give immunity against loot and arson.


The slogans raised by the attacking Muslim crowds were those of the Muslim League, such as 'League Zindabad' 'Pakistan Zindabad'; 'Larke Lenge Pakistan', 'Marke Lenge Pakistan'.


5. All those who resisted were butchered. Sometimes they were shot, for the rioters had a few shot-guns with them.


Sometimes people were killed even when there was no resistance offered or expected I have on record cases where 50 to 60 members of one family were brutally murdered. Some families lost all their male members.


6. (Is about the description and habitat of those who indulged in these crimes.)


7. Even after looting, arson and murder the Hindus in the locality were not safe unless they embraced Islam. The Hindu population therefore to save themselves had to embrace Islam en masse……… All the images of gods in Hindu houses were destroyed and all the Hindu temples of the affected area were looted and burnt.


8. There have been cases of forcible marriages There have been cases of abduction.


. "For obvious reasons it was not possible for me to ascertain the cases of rape. But women complained to Mrs. Kirpalani of having been roughly handled, their conch-shell bangles, the symbol of their married life, having been broken and vermillion marks removed. At one place they were thrown on the ground by the miscreants who removed their vermillion marks with the toes of their feet."


10 to 1 are about post-riot conditions.


14. The police did not function during the riots. They are doing merely patrol duty now. They say that they had and have no orders to fire except in self-defence. The question of definding themselves never arose, because they did not interfere with the rioters.


"The areas visited had already been devastated and all that I could see were burnt houses and helpless Hindu villagers whether converted or not."


Scouting any suggestion that the trouble may be economic the Acharya added, "Not a single rich Muslim house had been looted. To me it appeared to be absolutely communal and absolutely one-sided."


The Congress Working Committee meeting came soon after at Delhi, and its resolution on East Bengal contained the following observations


"Reports published in the press and statements of public workers depict a scene of bestiality and medieval barbarity that must fill every decent human being with shame, disgust and anger.


"The Committee hold that this outburst of brutality is the direct result of the politics of hate and civil strife that the Muslim League has practised for years past and of the threats of violence that were daily held out in past months."


This extensive account has been given of Noakhali for this reason, that coming soon after the Direct Action and Calcutta, this was the first large-scale beginning of that wholesale elimination of entire communities, that 'genocide' which from now on became the settled programme and policy of the Muslim League, not expressed or admitted officially, but nevertheless pursued and countenanced by it with vigour and with great satisfaction. It was clear after Noakhali as to what India was to expect in the coming months-mass attacks on minorities in Muslim-majority areas, co-operation of Muslim police and the officials with the assailants, indifference of the British bureaucrats, and the hypocritical fathering of the League leaders of the responsibility for these occurrences on the minorities themselves. In the case of Calcutta the League leaders blamed it all on the Hindus-in the case of Noakhali and Tipperah, the figures of casualties and damage were understated to ridiculous figures, or just not noticed. Had there been any regret expressed by the League on these happenings, had they sat up and realized the horror of what had happened and had their conscience pricked them, perhaps the recurrence of large-scale destruction like Noakhali would not have been possible. But the Leaguers viewed these happenings with glee. The programme was working according to plan.


Exactly the same pattern as in Noakhali and Tipperah was repeated during the next five months in other parts of India. These features were common to all these occurrences.


1. Places of occurrence were all heavy Muslim-majority areas-the minority attacked were Hindu or Hindu-Sikh. Successively they are Noakhali and Tipperah (October, 146) Hazara (December, 146 and January, 147); Rawalpindi (March, 147 For several weeks); Jhelum, Attock, Campbellpur, Dera Ismail Khan, Hazara, Multan, Gujrat, Gujranwala, Sargodha (all as before-mentioned). Lahore and Amritsar towns had an overwhelming Muslim majority in their populations though in the latter district as a whole the non-Muslims outnumbered the Muslims by a small percentage. In both towns from March, 147 onwards terrible outrages were perpetrated by Muslims on Hindus and Sikhs, the decisive result in either case being obtained only on the partition of the Punjab.


. Preparations were made by the Muslim League for attack on the minorities in every case a good time before the actual occurrence. Arms had been collected and distributed. Sufficiently large quantities of petrol and other inflammable substances had been hoarded for incendiarism. Training in swift methods of arson, stabbing, disposal of looted property and the killed had been imparted in the centres of the Muslim National Guards. Muslim police and officials had joined in hatching the plans with the Muslim League leaders and Muslim National Guard workers. The Muslim masses had been aroused to a pitch of anti-Hindu-Sikh fury by violent League propaganda.


. The attacks were simultaneous, widespread and in places so open and so sure of non-interference by the authorities that the assailants collected and marched with drums beating, shouting Muslim League slogans, and even making military formations. There was nothing secret about these attacks, as the police were already on the side of the attackers.


4. Large-scale arson, murder of males, abduction, rape and dishonour of women, brutalities to children, looting, forcible conversions etc. all these features were common to the localities affected. Those attacked were first asked to pay sums of money to pay off the invaders; then followed more demands, and attacks by outsiders. Local Muslims (that is, those of the village actually attacked) sometimes out of long habits of neighbourly intercourse, kept out of the actual attack, though of course they were in league with the invaders and abetted and helped them.


5. The victims were given no quarter when beseiged. Places of worship were desecrated, and religious feelings were outraged with fiendish gusto. Shaving of Sikhs, feeding of Hindus and Sikhs on beef, circumcision of Hindus and Sikhs, marrying away young girls and widows of Hindus, and Sikhs to Muslims-these practices were resorted to.


6. Police and the officials seldom appeared on the scene till long after the beseiged had been killed and their houses burnt and looted.


7. Muslim League leaders and Press said nothing in condemnation of these outrages. On the other hand, they trotted out imaginary stories of provocation by the non-Muslims, and of supposed retaliation by Muslims. This in every case kept up the morale of the assailants. .


This pattern was repeated in every one of the places that have been mentioned; and while the area of operations was necessarily limited while British power was still there, on the establishment of Pakistan it became general mass murder in West Punjab, in the North-Western Frontier Province, in Sind, Baluchistan and raider-held Kashmir.


Hindu Holocaust Day - August 14 Every Year. Lest we forget ...


Lord Louis Mountbatten


Lord Louis Mountbatten, India's first governor-general, had strongly felt that it was the Maharaja who should have the final word on whether to join the Jammu and Kashmir principality with India or with Pakistan or remain independent.Equally strongly, Mountbatten also recommended internationalisation of the Kashmir issue following the clash between India and Pakistan over the state's status in 147.In hindsight, these besides the other recommendations he made, ensured that the state remained a bone of contention between the two countries in future and prevented the two neighbours from striving for peace in the region.Sample this When Pakistani tribals invaded the princely state of Jammu and Kashmir on October , 147, Maharaja Hari Singh asked India for help but Lord Mountbatten held back. His argument was that he would not be able to send in troops at that juncture as General Claude Aunchinleck was the joint commander of Indian and Pakistani troops and Mountbatten did not want a situation wherein British forces faced British forces in war.Maharaja Hari Singh had to decide on accession to India or Pakistan before help could be sent. Time was running out. Tribals had penetrated deep and if Srinagar airport was captured, it would be difficult to send in Indian troops. On October 6, 147, Maharaja Hari Singh signed the Instrument of Accession in favour of India.Mountbatten, however, ruled that the accession was temporary and that the people of the state would finally decide to go with India or Pakistan on the basis of a referendum under the UN aegis.Somehow, Nehru agreed to Mountbatten's caveat with fateful consequences.Vallabhai Patels strongly objected to the suggestion but the Indian Cabinet referred the entire conflict to the United Nations Security Council. Many round of negotiations later, a ceasefire was negotiated in January 148. On August 1, 148, the Security Council submitted a resolution that was to shape the terms of India-Pakistan engagement on Kashmir for half a century.The August 1 resolution, which both India and Pakistan agreed to honour, had three parts. The first part called for a ceasefire to come into force. The second part mandated that since the presence of troops of Pakistan constitutes a material change and since it was represented by the Government of Pakistan before the Security Council, the Government of Pakistan agrees to withdraw its troops. Pakistan also committed to use its best endeavour to secure the withdrawal of tribesmen and other forces present there for the purposes of war. Section B of this second part of the resolution held that when the United Nations Commission for India and Pakistan (UNCIP) certified that Pakistani tribesmen and troops had withdrawn, India would withdraw from the State and all but a minimum level of force will be kept back to maintain law and order. Subsequently, Part Three of the resolution mandated, the future of Jammu and Kashmir would be decided in accordance with the will of the people.Lord Mountbatten's suggestion ensured that Kashmir remained a simmering pot of discontent. His suggestion of UN intervention also ensured that western powers would always be in a position to meddle in the affairs of Jammu and Kashmir.The suggestion of a plebiscite under the leadership of Sheikh Abdullah would probably ensure the merger of the state with Pakistan and the British knew India would never accept it. Tension would continue unabated as Pakistan would always refer to the plebiscite issue and harp on the UN charter to resolve the problem.For the British, Kashmir always was important outpost to Central Asia. They had a pro-British man on the throne of Jammu and Kashmir, and later, they organized the Gilgit agency to monitor Soviet Russia from Kashmir.By keeping control over Kashmir, the British also ensured that the region's largely Muslim population would also serve as a conduit through Pakistan to the Islamic world.


The 146 Cabinet Mission


When the Cabinet mission arrived in Delhi in March, it had three members, Cripps, A.V. Alexander and Pethick-Lawrence. They would work in close conjunction with the Viceroy who was assured that it was not intended that he should be treated as a lay figure.


The Missions task was to try to bring the leaders of the principle Indian political parties to agreement on two matters


The method of framing a constitution for a self-governing, independent India


The setting up of a new Executive Council or interim government that would hold office while the constitution was being hammered out.


The main problem was, as it always had been, the Hindu-Muslim partition. Congress wanted a unified India and the Muslim League wanted a separate, independent Pakistan. The Mission set to work at once, spending two weeks in lengthy discussions with representatives of all the principal political parties, the Indian States, the Sikhs, Scheduled Castes and other communities, and with Gandhi and several other prominent individuals. But at the end of these discussions there was still no prospect of an agreement between the parties and the mission decided to put forward the two possible solutions for consideration.


A truncated Pakistan, which Wavell had wanted to tell Jinnah was all he would get if he kept insisting on a sovereign Pakistan.


A loose federation with a three-tier constitution - provinces, group of provinces and an all-India union embracing both British India and the Indian States, which Cripps had devised with the help of two Indian officials, V.P. Menon and Sir B.N. Rau. The Union would be limited to three subjects, foreign affairs, defence and communications, with powers to raise funds for all three; all other subjects would vest in the provinces, but the provinces would be free to form groups, with their own executives and legislatures, that would deal with such subjects as the provinces within the group might assign them. In this way the Provinces that Jinnah claimed for Pakistan could form Groups or sub-federations and enjoy a large measure of autonomy thus approximating to Pakistan.


After some demur, Jinnah agreed to the federation plan, Congress also reluctantly agreeing and both parties were invited to send representatives to discuss it with the Mission at Simla. A week of discussions led to no agreement and the Mission decided to refurbish the plan to meet the views of the parties as far as possible that had been expressed at Simla. The final statement of the plan was published on May 16th.


The statement rejected decisively a wholly sovereign Pakistan of the larger or the smaller truncated variety. It went on to commend the plan for an all-India Union, with a three-tier constitution and went on to indicate the method how it should be brought about. A Constituent Assembly was to be elected by members of the Provincial Legislatures and after a preliminary full meeting, at which an advisory committee would be set up on fundamental rights, minorities and tribal areas, would divide into three Sections - Section A consisting of the representatives of the six Hindu-majority provinces; Section B of the representatives of the Punjab, the North-West Frontier Province and Sind; and Section C of the representatives of Bengal and Assam. These sections would draw up constitutions for the provinces included in them and would also decide whether a group should be formed and, if so, with what subjects; but a province would have the option to opt out of a group by a vote of its legislature after the new constitutional arrangements had come into operation. Finally the Constituent Assembly was to meet again as a whole, this time along with representatives of the Indian States in appropriate numbers to settle the Union Constitution.


The Statement was well received and was widely accepted as clear evidence of the British Governments genuine desire to bring British rule in India to a peaceful end. Gandhi pronounced it the best document the British Government could have produced in the circumstances. Jinnah was less enthusiastic, but both sides gave it consideration. Congress wanted to interpret the statement as meaning that provinces could choose whether or not to belong to the section in which they had been placed, but the Mission countered this with a further Statement on 5th May, in that the provinces in each section were an essential feature of the scheme.


Wavell and the mission wrote to the Indian states rulers, warning them that when Britain quit India it would cease to exercise the powers or shoulder the obligations of paramountcy. They would not in any circumstances transfer paramountcy to an Indian Government, but the ending of the relationship would leave a void, and it was suggested, would be best filled by entering into a federal relationship with the new Government of India as units in the proposed Union. They would retain their internal sovereignty and all their powers save those ceded to the Union in connection with the three subjects of foreign affairs, defence and communications. The Princes were reasonably content with this.


While the League and Congress were giving thought to the Statement of May 16th, the Mission went about the formation of a new executive council or interim government, but they also prepared and sent home a breakdown plan. The plan followed the premise that one of the main parties would reject the proposals. If the Muslim League rejected the proposals, Congress would go ahead on the premise that parts of the country not willing would be left out of the union. If Congress dismissed the proposals, it might be followed by a threat to seize power in another Quit India movement. Wavell proposed that the British should then withdraw from the six Hindu-majority provinces and allow them to become entirely independent but retain control of the other provinces until fresh arrangements acceptable to their population could be made.


However, discussion regarding the formation of an interim government which the Mission decided should be initiated by Wavell, was opened by him with the party leaders while they and the mission were still in Simla. The members of the interim government, except the Viceroy, would all be Indian and it would be, as far as possible, like a dominion government, but the Viceroy, in light of the existing constitution, would still retain overriding powers. Congress accepted these stipulations with a bad grace, but pleased Jinnah and the League who were happy to accept any check to Congress dominance of the interim government.


Discussions were still in progress when, on 6th June, the Muslim League voted to accept the constitutional proposals. The acceptance was said to be in the hope that it would ultimately result in the establishment of a complete sovereign Pakistan. The Congress working committee delayed giving their verdict, and further discussions about the interim government failed to bring about agreement as the League wanted parity with Congress and the exclusive right to nominate all Muslim members, both of which had been rejected by Congress.


The Mission, who were impatient to end their work and head home, decided to put forward compromise proposals. On June 16th, the Viceroy announced that discussion with the parties would not be further prolonged and that he was issuing invitations to fourteen named persons to serve as members of an interim government, Six were Hindu members of Congress including one member of the Scheduled castes, five were members of the Muslim League, and the remaining three a Sikh, a Parsee and an Indian Christian. The message also included a statement that stated


In the event of the two major parties or either of them proving unwilling to join in setting up a coalition government on the above lines, it is the intention of the Viceroy to proceed with the formation of an interim government which will be as representative as possible of those willing to accept the Statement of May 16th.


With the Muslim League ready to accept, Congress appeared to be on the verge of accepting until Gandhi intervened. Gandhi took his stand on principle, regardless of practical consequences. He said that acquiescence by Congress in the non-inclusion of a Congress Muslim in the interim government would be, he argued, the sacrifice of a vital principle to which Congress, as a national party with a Muslim president, could never agree at any time or place or in any circumstances. They rejected the interim government proposals. The Mission took the statement of June 16th to mean that Congress had agreed with the May 16th Statement that it was no longer possible to proceed with the formation of an interim government. Jinnah was infuriated by this interpretation, and now felt outwitted by Congress and tricked by Cripps. He declared the Missions interpretation had been dishonestly concocted by the legalistic talents of the Cabinet Mission and charged the Mission and the Viceroy with breach of faith. He also stated that the Congress acceptance of the May 16th Statement had not been genuine.


Wavell agreed with this view, but the mission wanted to try and salvage something and in a valedictory statement they expressed they gladness that Constitution-making can now proceed with the two major parties and their regret at the failure to form an interim coalition government, but said that after the elections to the Constituent Assembly had finished, the Viceroy would make fresh efforts to bring one into being. Meanwhile, a temporary caretaker government would be set up. The mission left bearing a note from Wavell that the government should be prepared for a crisis in India and must therefore have a breakdown policy in readiness.


Please note that this sample paper on Indian Independence is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Indian Independence, we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on Indian Independence will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.


Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!


Sunday, December 8, 2019

Critique of "The Cask of Amontillado"

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Critique of "The Cask of Amontillado". What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Critique of "The Cask of Amontillado" paper right on time.


Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Critique of "The Cask of Amontillado", therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Critique of "The Cask of Amontillado" paper at affordable prices!


"The Cask of Amontillado" is an obvious choice for the anthology after reading it. It contains many literary elements within its few pages. The elements that I particularly enjoyed were the tone, symbolism, and irony.


The plot of the story is integrated. It is a straight and to the point story about a man who vows, plots, and carries out plan of ultimate revenge on another man who he considers a friend. There are two characters in the story. The protagonist, Montresor, and the antagonist, Fortunato. Montresor has apparently been insulted by Fortunato and has decided that this insult cannot go unpunished according to his family crest nemo me impune lacessit (no one wounds me with impunity). Montresor devises a plan that allows him to lure Fortunato, with a cask of Amontillado, into the catacombs beneath his house and wall him up in a niche.


The setting of the story is an evening during carnival season in unnamed city, possibly in Italy. The story is told from the first person point of view by Montresor. The tone seemed self-righteous and I imagined the voice to be haughty and matter of fact. I considered Montresor to be an unreliable narrator due to the fact that he is trying to justify pre-meditated murder to the reader and exaggerates. "The thousand injuries of Fortunato…" seems a bit extreme but necessary when trying to convince the reader of his intentions.


The symbolism in this story is outstanding. Montresor's family crest is a good example. Montresor is telling the story as if he were the foot stomping on a snake that had bitten him, while I saw him as the snake that is biting the foot that has stepped on him. Other aspects of the story that appealed to me were the suspense of the horror style, and the imagery in the catacombs. I could imagine the whole atmosphere. The irony, both dramatic and verbal, really appealed to my sarcastic side. Poe uses dramatic irony in Fortunato's name and costume. He was not very fortunate and is made a complete fool for not seeing the obvious signs that Montresor shows him of his fate. There are numerous places that Poe uses verbal irony. Montresor expresses concern for Fortunato's health several times. Fortunato says, "…I shall not die of a cough" and Montresor replies, "True true…" knowing how he will die. Another example is when Fortunato asks if Montresor is a Mason and he says yes. When Fortunato asks for a secret sign, Montresor produces the trowel.


Write your Critique of "The Cask of Amontillado" research paper


There didn't seem to be an exact theme in the story. The story gives an overall message that revenge is not something that should be sought. Montresor did not learn anything in the story, but the reader should see that revenge is a reaction not a justified action. Revenge is biting a foot that steps on you, not stepping on the snake that bites you.


Poe, Edgar Allen. "The Cask of Amontillado." 1846. The Compact Bedford Introduction to Literature. Sixth Edition. Michael Myer. Boston Bedford/St. Martin's, 00. 46-467.


Please note that this sample paper on Critique of "The Cask of Amontillado" is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Critique of "The Cask of Amontillado", we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on Critique of "The Cask of Amontillado" will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.


Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!