-->

Monday, July 5, 2021

Politics on referendums

If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Politics on referendums. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Politics on referendums paper right on time.


Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Politics on referendums, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Politics on referendums paper at affordable prices!


A referendum is a vote by the people held by the government on issue that the government cannot decide on. Or that the government think is too important for representatives of the people (mps) to vote on.


Also a referendum is put into practice when a government wants it not the people also the government not the people draws up the questions asked. So in a sense it is possible for the people not to be able to vote on an issue they want e.g. devolution of a part of the UK. If the government don't want to have a referendum. Also it is not compulsory to have one.


Elections are compulsory and must happen about every five years even if the government don't want one. Which is one main difference between a referendum and an election also the government have no control on wording an election or have there power to set artificial barriers for example in the Scottish referendum 177 over 50% of the population eligible to vote had to vote yes. Even if the yes had a majority but 50% of those who could vote didn't vote yes than no devolution would happen.


Main difference Help with essay on Politics on referendums · An referendum is not compulsory a election is


· The government can word and change a referendum in elections they cant


· There is a limit to how much a party can spend in campaigning in a referendum there is no such barrier in an election


· The government can set artificial barriers such as 177 Scottish referendum in an referendum they cant do the with an election


· The government can set restions on which part of the UK can vote in a referendum again 177 Scottish referendum only Scottish people could vote they cant with elections it is open to all over 18 and the government or parliament cannot change this.


· The government can ignore the outcome of a referendum they cannot with an election


The Scottish referendum held in 177 was the first referendum held in the UK. It was like all referendums to be held later on devolution of Scotland from the UK. It would give the Scots an assembly in which to vote and decide on matters concerning Scotland but did not give them tax-varying powers. The labour party who had campaigned for a referendum held it. In a sense it can be said that they really did not want the referendum held it was designed to boast popularly for labour in Scotland not give Scotland devolution. The barriers set for the referendum was that over 50% of the population who could vote had to vote in favour of devolution so if even a majority won the vote it might not get passed if 50 % of the population who could vote did not vote in favour of the referendum. This referendum was for devolution of power to Scotland. The refferdum was not passed


The 17 Scottish referendum for devolution to Scotland was a referendum again held by the labour party when they got to power again. The referendum primary goal was to give devolution to Scotland with TAX VARING POWERS p on the pound. This would give the Scots a parliament to vote on matters of Scotland but still keeping Scotland in the UK. The primary reason for this referendum was to please the Scots as since 177 they had heavily been campaigning for the right to have Scotland as an indival state outside the UK. This was wanted to be avoided as this would mean that the uk would have less power in international matters. Also the referendum would give populaty to labour in Scotland .however this time there were no ataifical barriers set by the labour party. Two question were asked did Scotland want devolution. And did it want tax varying powers. The idea was to give Scotland more freedom but still keep them in the uk. Only sctish people could vote on the referendum . the refferdem was passed.


The 17 welsh referendum for devolution. The same circumstance for abouve to give l;abour more populartiy in wales. To keep wales in the uk whle still giving some power to the welsh. But not to give the welsh as much power as the Scots for example only one question was asked and the was did walse ant devoultin. The welsh were not offered tax varying powers like Scotland. And were not asked if they wanted it. Only the welsh could vote.


the disadvantages of referendums are


· The result can be ingnored by the government


· It is not compulsory so even if the population dispertly wanted a referendum it dose not have to happen it can only happen with the appovel of the government .


· Less people tend to vote in a referendum than an election so casn the result realy represtant the views of the people.


· The question asked are drawen up by the government not the people


· Atifacla barriers can be set for example the Scottish referendum 177


If less people vot e in an referendum is the result legitment and is the question really worthasking if a majority of people who can vote don't so obversly the do not feel stroungly enougth about the question aske.


The result can be ingnored by parliament and the government so it is not law that the outcome of a referendum has to met so in the 17 Scottish referendum the government could have ingnored the result and not given devolution


The government chose when and where a referderm is to be held it is not compulsory even if there are petions ect it is not like the amercain initves people do not have the power to chose when a referendum can be held and on what the government dose.


Attifacal barriers can be set which are unlikly to to be met which would mean that it would be very diffcult to get a referendum pased for exmaple the Scottish 177 referendum.


Please note that this sample paper on Politics on referendums is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Politics on referendums, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on Politics on referendums will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.


Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!


Friday, July 2, 2021

Love and sexuality in zora neala hurston

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on love and sexuality in zora neala hurston. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality love and sexuality in zora neala hurston paper right on time.


Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in love and sexuality in zora neala hurston, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your love and sexuality in zora neala hurston paper at affordable prices!


Love, Sexuality, and Power Their Eyes Were Watching God


In many instances people have a hard time distinguishing between sex, love, and happiness. At times they are all very different, but one instance that comes to mind is when power is involved. According to a capitalist society, money and status should coincide with happiness. For Janie, the female protagonist in Zora Neale Hurston's novel Their Eyes Were Watching God, her search for identity, love, and power is a struggle that is opened up through her sexuality. She gives up a low status with her first love-less marriage, for one in which she thought there was love, but instead it resulted in a repression of sexuality and identity. Janie's greatest love of all lowered her social status, but there were no worries because it was a sexual and love filled relationship in which her husband became her partner. Hurston does a wonderful job telling this story by using metaphors, symbolism, and poetic descriptive language. She introduces themes through symbols, which carry out throughout the novel stressing the importance of such issues as sexuality, love, and power.


One prominent symbol of sexuality in this novel is the meaning of the pear tree. Janie would spend her days laying under the pear tree, and dreaming away of love. Her sexuality is revealed while watching the bees performing the action of pollination with the pear blossoms. This action takes over her body and brings out her sexual desire from within. It is after this that Janie kisses Johnny Taylor and is caught by her Nanny. This is the first time Janie finds her sexual desire being repressed. It is her Nanny that implants opinions of love, that later help her to realize her identity. With this kiss, her Nanny proclaims that she is now a woman, and therefore she must be married. Janie thinks otherwise basing her opinion of marriage on the love that she found under the pear tree. Her Nanny knows otherwise, and knows that marriage is a state in which a woman needs protection from sexual abuse and in financial stability. Over time love will come, but Janie does not accept this for she thinks "that the vision of Logan Killicks was desecrating the pear tree," (14).


The pollination of the pear tree symbolizes Janie's ideal relationship and will so for the rest of her life. She describes it on page eleven by sayingOrder custom research paper on love and sexuality in zora neala hurston


"She saw a dust-bearing bee sink into the sanctum of a bloom; the thousand sister-calyxes arch to meet the love embrace and the ecstatic shiver of the tree from the root to the tiniest branch creaming in every blossom and frothing delight. So this was a marriage!"


When she is married off to Logan Killick, it is a marriage out of convenience and not one out of love. This marriage crushed her dream of a love filled marriage, and shatters the thought of the pear tree. The pear tree dies and rejuvenates throughout the story as her love life changes. It grows and evolves as Janie does.


Her marriage ends as Janie meets a man by the name of Joe Starks. He is a prominent black man that could lift her out of her hole, and bring her the love she was looking for. On top of meeting Mr. Starks, Janie's relationship with Logan was deteriorating more and more everyday. Logan even went as far as to buy a mule, one that Janie would work out in the field. You can see that in this relationship Janie refuses to work with in the fields with and for a man with whom she does not love.


The idea of working hard was out of the question, for Janie thought that she was above this. She even had an open invitation to go with Joe Starks who propositioned Janie with a better life. A woman like herself, who is so beautiful, did not deserve to be apart of the lower class, in which she would have to work. One huge element of Janie's beauty was her long luxurious hair. It was a quality in which other African-American women were quite jealous of. On top of the straight hair she also had lighter skin, for she was a mulatto. These qualities shape her identity and sexuality, as well as her power. Janie's hair is the first thing that attracts Joe Starks to her.


It is Janie's hair that shows her power and the rise and fall of her relationships. When she had first married Logan, he was in awe of her and loved her hair. As their relationship dwindled and Janie falls off of the pedestal, he stops touching her hair. She regains a sense of power with the meeting of Joe Starks. We see the connection between her sexuality and power as her relationship continues with him.


Once they are together, Joe asks Janie to call him by the name of Jody, and she does so. This is the first example of his power over her. Once they reach Eatonville, Jody accepts his role as the town leader and takes it home with him. Jody is well aware of the sexuality Janie exudes, and how lovely her hair is. To take precautions and to make sure none of the local men or any men touch her hair, he makes her wear her hair tied up. Over her hair she wears a rag, for there should be no temptation. Janie was Jody's wife and there would be no mistake of that.


Throughout their marriage Janie is treated more and more as an object and she is denied a voice in which she would be heard. There is a shift of power, but only at the end of their marriage. Jody insults her in front of everyone at the store, and for once Janie does not hold back. She realizes how things really are and insults him in the worst possible way. She insults his manhood by saying in front of everyone, "Humph! Talkin about me lookin' old! When you pull down yo' britches, you look lak de change uh life," (7). Not too long after this incident did Jody die from kidney failure.


After his death, the first move Janie made was to take down her hair from the rags. On top of that she would get rid of them so that her hair could forever hang down. Her hair was also a reflection of the love Tea Cake had for her. He loved to run his hands through her hair. The difference with him and the others is that his love for her was true and not out of convenience, or objectivity, it was a love and admiration for the person Janie was. Janie's hair is a symbol of who she is, and it is her that he loves. With Tea Cake in her life we see and feel the presence of the pear tree once again, as it blossoms with their love.


Tea Cake was more then just a great love for Janie, for he represented what she was looking for. Janie spent her entire life looking for the greatest love, and still the freedom to express her sexuality. She expresses sexuality with every movement made, and brushing of the hair. She is a female, and a sexual one for that matter. She is so sexual that the women around her are quite jealous. So much in fact that when the book opens, we are introduced to the town gossips badmouthing and exaggerating Janie's story. There is a description that describes what the men see as Janie walk by that says, "The men noticed her firm buttocks like she had grape fruits in her hip poclets; the great rope of black hair swinging to her waist and unraveling in the wind like a plume; then her precious breasts trying to bore holes in her shirt," ().


This novel is more or less a woman's journey for self-identity, and the search for love. Even though she had love, Janie only felt love with Tea Cake. He gave her a sense of freedom, and self-reliance. With him she had the power to be herself, express her feelings, enjoy herself, and most of all wear her hair down. Janie's Nanny told her that when marriage is concerned love is not necessarily there. It took her two failed marriages and one that ended so tragically to realize this. After the first two marriages Janie almost believed that the search for love and happiness was lost, but Tea Cake brought her dreams to life.


Janie is the female that wants freedom and searches for it but then gives it up to the men in her life. She needs these men to make her feel loved and attractive. As such in many cases, Janie starts off with the power in their relationships, while she keeps the men in awe of her. As the relationships move on she becomes more submissive, and her power is lost. In her first two marriages, not only was her power gone, but so was her sexual appeal. Tea Cake's control was more out of what was expected from him by his peers as well as jealous rage. When Jody hit Janie it destroyed her, but it was different with Tea Cake. Janie knew that he loved her, and did it to show those around her that she was his woman. For the sake of love this situation was "okay."


At the end of the story, when Janie is informing Pheoby of what happened, she describes just how much her relationship with Tea Cake affected her. To Janie, Tea Cake would never be dead, "He could never be dead until she herself had finished feeling and thinking," (1). After his death Janie could live out the rest of her life filled with love, extruding sexuality, and having power of her own life. By discovering what love was to her, she was able to have the power to hold onto Tea Cake while at the same time finding herself. She accepts her past and has taken as much as she could from her life experiences. Janie has grown old and wise, and even gives Pheoby advice that is quite prolific. She says, "two things everybody's got tuh do fuh theyselves. They got tuh go tuh God, and they got tuh find out about livin' fuh theyselves," (1). Janie was a woman, and one who had suffered hardships, and heartache. She would end her life having the one thing in which she had spent so much time searching for. She had love, she loved herself, and she would love her man until the end of time. Janie's power came from finally finding love, and proving those that said it would not happen, wrong.


Please note that this sample paper on love and sexuality in zora neala hurston is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on love and sexuality in zora neala hurston, we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on love and sexuality in zora neala hurston will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.


Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!


Thursday, July 1, 2021

Before becomming Thailands capital

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Before becomming Thailands capital. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Before becomming Thailands capital paper right on time.


Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Before becomming Thailands capital, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Before becomming Thailands capital paper at affordable prices!


Became Thailand's capital in 178; Bangkok was an outlying district of Thonburi. King Rama I created and defined the city when he decided to move the capital across the river from Thonburi to Bangkok in 178. Since he thought that the location was easier to defend. Thousands of Khmer prisoners of war were forced to build the city walls, and the existing canal system was extended to relieve transport problems. Artisans of Ayutthaya build new temples. Construction of Bangkok was completed in 1785, it was given an elongated name consisting of 164 letters, but was colloquially called Krung Thep (City of Angels), and Bangkok is the name of the city to the outside world. Under the rule of Rama III Thailand was successful in reestablishing relations and making trades with China which were necessary to meet the increasing domestic agricultural production. He also started a frenzy of temple building. During his monastic period, he reformed the education system and allowed limited western trade. King Mongut (Rama IV) created new laws to improve the women and children's rights. He also opened new waterways and the first road of Bangkok (Chareonkrung). King Chulalongkorn (Rama V) started to reform the tradition, and the legal and administrative realm. Under his reign, Thailand developed relations with European nations and the USA. He introduced schools, roads, railways, and Thailand's first post office. In 18, he overhauled the administration to form a cabinet government. He also abolished slavery, promoted modernization, and sacrificed large Thai territories to prevent European colonization. King Rama VII changed Thailand's form of government from absolute monarchy to democracy. This developed the constitutional monarchy. Under Rama IX's government, which is the current government, the country's name was officially changed from Siam to Thailand in 146. In Thai this was defined as "Prathet Thai" meaning the country of the free Thai races.


The population of Bangkok really skyrocketed after 170 at which point it was .5 million and by 000 Bangkok's population had exploded to 10 million. In 1 Thailand established a constitutional government and Bangkok became the hub of a vast expanding service industry. Following World War II Bangkok quickened its pace towards modernization. From the mid-160's Bangkok became a favourite amongst tourists looking for 'rest, recreation, and relaxation'. Bangkok was riding a double-digit economic boom through the 180's. Bangkok was hit hard by the economic crisis that swept Asia in 17. However, while other Asian economies continued in crisis, Thailand was beginning to resuscitate its financial systems and its economy. Today Bangkok is back at its role as the financial hub of mainland South-East Asia, luring a mixture of Asian and Western investors. The city continues to expand, attracting hordes of visitors each year. Increased population and modernization from the 170's onwards have caused some problems in Bangkok. The housing situation is appalling as there are over 10 million people in Bangkok and a direct result of the population and modernization explosion is a problem with severe traffic congestion. The loss of many cultural sections of Bangkok is a high price to pay for modernization.All in all Bangkok has been moving forward and is continually developing.


Order Custom Before becomming Thailands capital paper


Please note that this sample paper on Before becomming Thailands capital is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Before becomming Thailands capital, we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on Before becomming Thailands capital will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.


Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!


A White Heron

If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on A White Heron. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality A White Heron paper right on time.


Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in A White Heron, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your A White Heron paper at affordable prices!


Comparing and contrasting Jewett's Sylvy in A White Heron with May Bartram of James's The Beast in the Jungle proves to be an interesting task. How can two such unlike characters be so alike. Only on close examination do these common threads appear.


In the story A White Heron, Sylvy is presented as a young, pre-adolescent girl, living in the country with her grand mother. They are very isolated to themselves, living fairly simple and frugal lives. Sylvy has a few mundane responsibilities which give way to plenty of time for meandering about, and day dreaming while setting about her task. One evening, after much searching for their cow, which proved to be a daily chore, she was coercing the cow back home when surprised by the presence of a stranger. He was ever so polite and friendly. He was hunting the Great White Heron and had hoped she or her family might put him up for the evening. In a nice sort of way he was pushy and insistent. Not used to interacting with many people, the reader can see it would have been a difficult situation for her to handle any other way. Rather, it handled her. The grandmother was most receptive and hospitable. Over the course of the short stay, Sylvy realized many things. The hunter offered money in exchange for help in finding the heron's nest. Not only was his offer tempting and attractive, but a curiosity awakened in her as he was most attractive as well. She was somewhat intrigued and in a fog, taken each moment and each step one at a time, carefully, slowly. Sylvy seems to come to her senses in the twelfth hour when she climbs high into the trees early one morning to see the white heron fly in ever so close. It was as though their was a kinship between the two, an understanding. Because of this special feeling for the bird, Sylvy could not succumb to the hunter's desire for knowledge of the nest and never divulged the secret.


Please note that this sample paper on A White Heron is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on A White Heron, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on A White Heron will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.


Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!


Tuesday, June 29, 2021

Tessie Hutchinson in "The Lottery"

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Tessie Hutchinson in "The Lottery". What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Tessie Hutchinson in "The Lottery" paper right on time.


Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Tessie Hutchinson in "The Lottery", therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Tessie Hutchinson in "The Lottery" paper at affordable prices!


Tessie Hutchinson in "The Lottery"


Tessie Hutchinson is a middle-aged housewife and mother of four children. She is the unfortunate scapegoat/victim of the annual village lottery. Being late for the lottery, making rebellious remarks, and questioning the rules of the lottery are all hints that set Tessie up to be the lottery's victim. She represents one of few voices of rebellion in a village controlled by tradition and complacency. Her low status as a woman has led many critics to state that Tessie's fate illustrates the authority of men over women.


Tessie is a woman whose role as a housewife deprived her of her freedom by forcing her to submit to a husband who gains his power over her by virtue of his place in the work force. Tessie, however, rebels against her role, and such rebellion is just what the orderly functioning of her society cannot stand. The villagers believe, unconsciously, that their commitment to a work ethic will grant them some magical immunity from selection.


Tessie's rebellion begins with her late arrival at the lottery. She explains to Joe Summers, the administrator of the lottery, that she was doing dishes and forgot what day it was. This could be interpreted as violating the village's work ethic and neglecting her specific job within the village's social division of labor, which the lottery actually reinforces. In Peter Kosenko's research, he believes the selection of Tessie Hutchinson as the lottery's scapegoat shows us the unconscious connection that the villagers draw between the lottery and their work ethic.Order Custom Essay on Tessie Hutchinson in "The Lottery"


When Tessie realizes that her husband holds the unlucky slip, she cries out that the process was not fair. The reader learns at this moment that the lottery does not offer a reward or prize in the traditional sense. She claims her husband had to rush to choose the slip of paper and that her daughter and son-in-law should be included in the following round of drawing. She is the only one who rebels against male domination. Each remark she makes evokes nervous laughter from the crowd, which sense the taboo that she has violated.


When Tessie draws the paper with the deadly black mark on it, she does not show it to the crowd; instead her husband Bill forces it from her hand and holds it up. By holding up her slip, Bill Hutchinson reasserts his dominance over his wayward wife and simultaneously transforms her into a symbol to others of the perils of disobedience. Bill's unquestioning acceptance of the results of the lottery, despite the victim being his own wife, emphasizes the brutality the villagers are willing to carry out in the name of tradition.


Tessie's rebellion, being entirely unconscious, is revealed by her cry while being stoned, "It isn't fair, it isn't right." Tessie does not object to the lottery, only to her own selection as it's scapegoat. It would have been fine if someone else had been selected. Perhaps the village might have chosen Tessie if the lottery had been, in fact, an election.


Works Cited


Jackson, Shirley, "The Lottery," Literature: An Introduction to Fiction, Poetry,


and Drama. Ed. X. J. Kennedy and Dana Gioia. 8th ed. New York: Longman,


2002. pg. 254-261.


http://galenet.galegroup.com, "The Lottery" by Shirley Jackson, Plot Summary,


Discovering Authors.


www.netwood.net, "A Reading of Shirley Jackson's "The Lottery," Peter Kosenko.


Please note that this sample paper on Tessie Hutchinson in "The Lottery" is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Tessie Hutchinson in "The Lottery", we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on Tessie Hutchinson in "The Lottery" will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.


Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

Monday, June 28, 2021

Manson family

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on manson family. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality manson family paper right on time.


Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in manson family, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your manson family paper at affordable prices!


The Manson Family


In this paper on the Manson Family, I will discuss the murders, the


evidence which created the case, the trial and the conviction. I will show


you that due to ignorance a case could be held up and and ties are not


Buy manson family term paper


made to solve a case. You will also see that confessions are critical in a


case and that they change the course of an investigation.


The first murders were the Tate murders. These murders took place


at the Beverly Hills home of Sharon Tate, a pregnant movie star. Sharon


was joined by three of her friends, Abigail Folger, the Folgers coffee


heiress, Abigail's boyfriend Voytek Frykowski Sharon's house was


secluded and secured by a locked gate and there was also an able-


bodied young caretaker. Around 10-1 A.M. Sharon's neighbors heard


a few gunshots coming from Sharon's property but heard nothing else so


they went back to bed. Around the same time Tim Ireland, supervising a


camp-out, heard a chilling scream," Oh, God, No, Please don't! Oh God,


no, don't, don't... He drove around a little but found nothing unusual. At 8


a.m. housekeeper Winifred Chapman noticed a fallen telephone wire and


noticed an unfamiliar white Rambler. She entered the back door and


confirmed the dead telephone. She then noticed the front door was open


and splashes of blood were everywhere. Looking out the front door she saw a couple pools of blood and what looked like a body in the lawn. She ran back through the house and close enough to the Rambler to notice another body. She ran to the neighbors and notified the police. One by one three officers arrived to discover the body in the Rambler. Looking into the front lawn they saw two other bodies. One of the victims, a man, had his head and face bashed in and also dozens of puncture wounds in the rest of his body. The other lawn victim, a woman, had multiple stab wounds. The officers, Robert Burbridge, Jerry DeRosa and William Whisehunt, approach the house and notice a removed window screen. Two of the officers found an open window where they entered the house while the other officer entered the front door. The officer which entered the front door noticed at the bottom of the door the word "pig" in blood. In the hallway was two large streamer trunks, a pair of horned rimmed glasses and a broken gun grip which is big later in the investigation. He then found the last two bodies. One of which was a pregnant woman with a noose around her neck and at the other end was a man. The officers heard a man's voice and the sound of a dog which turned out to be the caretaker William Garretson. The officers arrested him. The second murders where the LaBianca murders. Leno and Rosemary LaBianca were on there way home from a vacation with Rosemary's daughter Susan Struthers. After dropping Susan off at her apartment nobody saw the the LaBiancas until the following day. At around 80 p.m. Frank Struthers, Rosemary's son from a previous marriage, pulled up to the house and noticed some things that worried him. The bout was still in the driveway from the previous day and all the shades where down which the LaBiancas never do. Frank knocked on the door and got no response. He then went to a pay phone to call them and still no answer. He finally got in touch with his sister Susan which then came to the house with her boyfriend. The three of them entered thru the back door which they found open. Frank and the boyfriend left Susan in the kitchen while they went thru the house. When the men walked into the living room they found Leno in his pajamas with a pillow over his head, a chord around his neck and something sticking out of his stomach. Grabbing Susan they ran to the neighbors house and called the police. As soon as the police arrived they found Leno and to go along with the before mentioned they found his hands tied with a leather thong and the word "war" carved in his stomach by the fork. Rosemary was found in the master bedroom with her nightgown pulled over her head. She also had a pillow case over her head and a chord around her neck. Also in three different places the words "Death to Pigs", "Rise", and "Healther Skelter" which was misspelled and written in blood. But before these murders there was a music teacher murdered in his living room and in his blood there was the words "Political Piggy" written on the wall. The music teacher's name was Gary Hinman.


The LAPD had not connected the murders together even after being told about the Gary Hinman murder. All they had was the caretaker for Sharon Tate which had passed a polygraph. The LAPD decided that the Tate murders was a drug deal gone bad and that the LaBianca murders was nothing more than robbery. Even after finding out about the Hinman murder and the similarity between all of them the LAPD refused to look into a connection between them. A man by the name of Bobby Beausoleil was arrested for the Hinman murder. He was found living with a bunch of hippies led by Charles Manson. The LA sheriff's office decided that the Tate and LaBianca murders where connected and decided to look into the similarities of them and the Hinman murder. The investigation led to the Spahn Ranch which was the home of the Manson Family. The Manson Family is a group of hippies which was led by Charles Manson. The family found the ranch by chance while traveling in there bus through the mountains. The ranch reflected the misfits and rejects that Charlie had collected in the back of his black bus. The family settled in rent free with the understanding that the girls of the family would perform sexual favors for the owner of the ranch, George Spahn. The family would gather food from dumpsters behind supermarkets. Manson also gathered unwanted people and told them that "in love there is no wrong." The family also took LSD on a regular basis. The prosecution's star witness said that she had taken over 00 trips of acid said she could not determine fact and fantasy do to the acid. Beausoleil's girlfriend confessed to the Hinman murder and also to stabbing another man repeatedly in the legs which may have been part of the Tate murders. The LAPD had finally got involved in the investigation and three months after the murders the LAPD and the LA sheriff's office had still been conducting separate investigations. While the Sheriff's office suspected Charles Manson it wasn't till months after that the LAPD started talking to the Sheriff's office.


Beausoliel's girlfriend also said that Susan Atkins was involved in the murders. She was already in custody and while in custody she confessed to a lot. While in an institution, she confessed to a roommate to killing Hinman and also about fighting with a man that she stabbed repeatedly in the legs which turned out to be part of the Tate murders. She also said that Charlie was her lover and that he was Jesus Christ. She also mentioned that Charlie was going to lead them to a hole in the center of the earth. She later confessed to the murder of Sharon Tate. She said that her, two other girls and a man were instructed to do so by Charlie. Following this, she confessed to killing the LaBiancas the night after the Tate murders. People close to the Manson family also reported other confessions by the family not only of the already mentioned murders but also of a ranch hand who Charles thought would tell the head of the Spahn Ranch. The Sheriff's office with the overdue cooperation of the LAPD decided to pursue the family and arrested them. On November 18, 16 Deputy DA Vincent T. Bugliosi was assigned to the Manson Family murder trial. Despite the the confessions, the Prosecution did not have as much evidence as it should have. The police eradicated fingerprints and misplaced other evidence which deprived the crime scene of telling it's story. In addition, the forensic chemist failed to gather blood samples from the scene and failed to run subtypes on twenty one of the twenty four samples taken. However, they did have finger prints from the Tate house which were traced back to the suspects and thanks to a citizen the missing piece of the gun grip was placed to the revolver it belonged to, the murder weapon. These two things plus the confessions were enough. It only took twenty minutes for the jury to hand down indictments. The family decided for whatever reason to shave their heads for the trial and again for the verdict, perhaps to sure unity or togetherness or maybe even to show they are not afraid of what's to come. They were all found guilty of murder in the first degree and also conspiracy to commit murder. Since they were found guilty there sentence was death. However, in 17, The California Supreme Court abolished the death penalty and they are all presently serving life sentences in prison. It took over a year for the capture and conviction of Manson and his family.


Due to the stubbornness of the LAPD to cooperate with the Sheriff's office and the failure to make the connection immediately, these cold blooded killers were at large with the possibility to kill again. If they would have got together earlier they would have got the connections much earlier and perhaps brought these murderers to justice much sooner. However long it took, the confession and the discovery of the gun with the broken grip was more than sufficient to put this mentally sick and unstable family behind bars for life. Manson, though perhaps crazy, was wise in the way he ran the family. He found unwanted, there for emotionally damaged people to join his family. He would load them up on LSD and tell them lies like he was Jesus and Satan at the same time. He brainwashed these people and convinced them they had to do what they did. These people were mad at society and it wasn't hard to persuade them to commit these murders. I feel that, though it is highly unlikely, they should reinstate the death penalty in the state of California and out them all to death. It may help put the emotions of the victim's friends and family to rest and for fill the justice due to these killers.


Please note that this sample paper on manson family is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on manson family, we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on manson family will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.


Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!


Issues analysis

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on issues analysis. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality issues analysis paper right on time.


Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in issues analysis, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your issues analysis paper at affordable prices!


The Title of the article 'give the lady a gun' automatically suggests that the author Neil Mitchell is all for the use of women in combat as displayed by the opening paragraph - which bluntly states that women are better than men. As soon as the reader comprehends these initial first words, there leaves no doubt that the reast of the article will follow suit in its pro women in combat slant. Whilst it is clear from Mitchell's title and opening that he is bias toward women in this issue it differs entirely from the other two respective articles.


When first reading the title of Pamela Bone's 'The sexes of the battle', it does not give the impression that she is pro or con on the issue but rather neutral and simply stating the facts regardig the debate on whether or not women should be allowed in combat. This is also apparent in Beth Gillin's 'Women's place in battle queried'. These titles are not as seductively impressive as Mitchell's title but their opening paragraphs of both articles impresses the reader with the writers stance on the issue, which in both instances are fairly impartial with Bone's article leaning more toward a question of choice.


The opening statement of Bone's 'the sexes of the battle' questions the irony of allowing women in battle, but restricting them from the battle frontlines. This gives the reader the impression that Bone finds this ruling as contradictory and condescending in terms of women's equality in terms of soldiering abilities. Gillin's opening statement in her article ' Women's place in battle queried', plays on the anti women in combat slant by using sympathetic tones by contrasting the actual situation with the supposed.


In analysing the tone of each article, starting with Mitchell's, where throughout most of the article he demonstrates a pro women in combat opinion, by comparing their abilities to men's, using statements such as " women are smarter, more intuitive, less aggressive and better decision makers" and " they are more likely to be clear headed in a crisis". These statements are indicative of the whole tone of his article as there are many more points he uses to impress upon the reader his bias toward women being just as good a soldier as men and should be treated as an equal in war. Quite the contrary to Gillin's tone which is mostly reproachful of using women in combat, whilst still just stating the facts. Her attitude is vividly displayed in her statement which follows the plight of three women soldiers in the iraq war, one of whom died, the others were prisoners of war. The statement says" All three were in harm's way, but their maintenance jobs were presumed to be safer than front-line positions." Bone's article is more equilibrated in its tone, and this is demonstrated by her use of data and quotes from many sources, which allows the reader to form their own opinion.


Custom writing service can write essays on issues analysis


In comparing the photos used in the two articles of Gillin's and Mitchell's, we see the use of images that are more emotional than informative to the reader. The photo used for Beth Gillin's article shows the women Lori Piestewa, that was shot in combat, of americal indian descent, and a mother of two young children, by using this photo added to the data it engages the readers sympathy and attention and draws a negative response toward using women in battle. Mitchell's photo on the other hand shows strong fit attractive and intelligent Australian female Liuetenant on board the HMAS Kanimbla this woman clearly displays great capability and strength in combat.


Bone's article had no photo or cartoon, leaving the reader to establish an opinion based on facts, and data that she has gathered and presented, rather than blindly following the writers stance on the issue.


All three articles have used examples to present their arguments, in the case of Mitchell and Gillin they both used the subject of Private Jessica Lynch a prisoner of war who underwent torture and finally rescued, glorifying her strength and courage. In Mitchell's article he presents her as a national hero who is an exemplary figure to all women in general, but specifically to women soldiers. In Gillin's article she presents her as a victim who should not have been in the firing line at all, but nevertheless courageous in her stand against the enemy and later on in her survival even after hideous torture. Again raising the status of Private Lynch to that of national hero. In the case of Bone she mentions Private Lynch briefly in her first paragraphs, working with facts and statements from army officials. Bone comments on her being pretty, blonde, 1 and destined to become the symbol of women fighters in the war in Iraq. This is more a statement on the public need for war heroes than her own opinion. Bone prefers to quote Bloomsbury feminist Virginia Woolf and other feminists, politicians and authors using their opinions and quotes to deliver a more balance view of the issue.


Having analysed all three articles and considered the validity of their content I believe that if a women is physically, mentally and emotionally equipped for frontline battle as a man is then I don't see why the military restrictions apply. I believe women should be given a choice whether they want to serve in the military, which in turn means the possibility of involvement in frontline combat. Since women are avidly active in the political arena, which can govern the destiny of whether a country goes to war or not, they should also be prepared to fight for their decisions their government has made even if it means going to war.


Please note that this sample paper on issues analysis is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on issues analysis, we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on issues analysis will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.


Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!